| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:15:02 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Assuming a roughly all-round, no-particular-direction antenna is required, then the most simple antenna is called for. A simple antenna is also the most efficient. The most simple antenna is just a straight, vertical rod fed at its center between its two halves. For F = 434 MHz, overall dipole length is crudely 0.33 metres = 13 inches. Reg, you obviously know a thing or two about antennas. I need to come up with a small antenna for a hand-held 40Mhz transmitter. I'd like to use some sort of rubber duck helicoil to save space if poss. Any ideas as to dimensions etc? The output impedance of the tx is around 140 ohms. -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||