|
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.
|
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.
Al Klein wrote: On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:49:00 GMT, (Hymie) wrote: Very well put. Every mode is useful, important and valuable in different situations. What's unfortunate, is that the only modes the anti-CW crowd wants and supports are "Lazy Mode" and "Retard mode" Even those who tout digital modes - they want to buy an interface and software and "be" on digital. Then they wonder why the signal they're hearing, that sounds just like the digital mode they use, doesn't work on their setup. Maybe because a PSK program won't decode SSTV? learn what you are tlaking about psk31 sounds very little like sstv and most of the programs that can demolate it show you a spectrograhand they look nothing alike there is some time confusion in wether that sgnal BPSK 31 or QPSK31 but the marvels of Windows wallo me to run the output of the sound card interface to at least 2 program so it can be worked out you just want to bash any ham that doesnot follow your morse fetish Reminds me of the GPRS "exerts" who can't understand why changing the "code" on their radios doesn't eliminate the interference from the guy next door. The anti-CW crowd wants no code and a written test you can memorize the answers to. It's their "right" to be on the air, isn't it? Even if they need 2 more clues to be totally clueless? it is our right and everybody else right that any restriction to our access to public spectrum be "neccisary and proper" (one of 3 clauses in the constitution that give the power to regulate the airwave to the govet at all) otherwise the 10 reserving all right and power to the sates or the people applies modifing that is the thrid place where the consititution of US touches on this issue mby making the constitution and the TREATIES made the supreme law of the land according the Govt lost the POWER to impose Morse Code test on the ARS unless it can be justified under some other powere of the Constitution I find it interesting that the ProCode tes crowd has such disrespect for that document |
(OT) : Democrat's Out-Sourcing "Hate America" To Canada !
On 13 Jul 2006 23:46:59 -0700, "RHF"
wrote: Reg Edwards wrote: As For Me - I Was Born In The USA -and- I Am Proud To Be An American ! ~ RHF ==================================== - You are proud to be a US Citizen. - - Canadans, Cubans, Mexicans, Brazilians, Argentinians, Chileans, - etc., are also Americans. The name has been high-jacked. RE, The Mexicans just may refer to themselves as : Norte Amercanos -or- Americanos del Norte http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estados...a_Am%C3%A9rica The Cubans might call themselves : Americanos de Cuba. Seriously NO Canadian would call themselves an : American [.] - - - Even the French Canadians would say : Je Suis Un Canadien ! And the Argentinians, Chileans would most likely call themselves : Sur Americanos -or- Americanos del Sur -or- Americanos Latinos The Brazilians being slightly different would say : Americanos Sul Only an American (USA) would Boldly Say : I Am An American ! - and I Am Proud of It ! and so say i ~ RHF . . . . Runaway nationalism has its problems. bob k5qwg |
OT: Outsourcing
Slow Code wrote:
"RHF" wrote in ups.com: JB - Spoken like a True Red and White {Blue-in-the-Face} Canadian ~ RHF . . . . Kanadians are more Red... Commie Red. slow code is lo-co |
OT: Outsourcing
jawod wrote: Slow Code wrote: "RHF" wrote in ups.com: JB - Spoken like a True Red and White {Blue-in-the-Face} Canadian ~ RHF . . . . Kanadians are more Red... Commie Red. slow code is lo-co yea he canada arabs jews it seems, Ham radio, republicans and democrats anybody he doesn't hate |
(OT) : Democrat's Out-Sourcing "Hate America" To Canada !
J. D. B. wrote:
Sorry John, do some reading for once as that is the reality of the Canadian system. You'll actually learn something if you do research yourself and not just listen to NPR and CNN. Now, on the other hand, if you live in the U.K., you'll still have healthcare through the end of the year, but if you are too old, they just let you die as it is not worth the expenditure to keep someone old alive even longer. But again, hey, your estate gets to keep the money! Come on, this isn't really John now is it? Hillary Clinton, is that you? John Barnard wrote: You are one delusional mofo! Lay off the Bush sauce and you'll be able to handle reality. JB Oh Brother! Reality check time: Why don't YOU read a bit about Medicare D? Aging baby boomers are about to be screwed in ways they couldn't even imagine. Insurance companies entirely control Congressional debate and actually write the rules. Most of Congress doesn't even READ what they're signing on to. O'Reilly, is that you? |
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewithother.
dxAce wrote:
Smokey wrote: If you want easy...and most of the CW whiners do...why don't you just hook your laptop up to your DSL line and stay the hell off the air? Jeez, you've got a pathetic joke for an exam now with canned questions to memorize and no code to learn. Too bad you're not still in your mother's womb so you don't have to feed yourselves. Though you have deluded yourselves into believing you are "hams," you are hardly believable when you wear that title. The only reason you have been able to slip through into the dumbed-down requirements and some sort of fcc "license" sham is because your appliance manufacturers that make your rigs and the charlatans like the arrl are selling out the hobby so they can sell you things. It's ALL ABOUT THE MONEY and you no-coder idiots have fallen for it. As for traditional, genuine "hams, we may be from the "Stone Age," but once the dinosauers became extinct the pristine landscape took on pollution and overcrowding. You simpletons have all drank the Kool-Aid and cannot see that you are parties to the eventual elimination of ham radio. Thank God for "stone age hams," for at least there is someone still around that knows something about the avocation. Amen. dxAce Michigan USA "J. D. B." wrote in message ... John, Just get on digital modes. Don't worry about CW. Digital is where the fun is and the copy is much better. A buddy of mine in St. Louis and I experimented with low power and various digital modes last night on 40 meters. CW was marginal. The best was DominoEX with FEC - just about 100% all the time and it also has a second channel to display additional information. CW can be fun at times, but maybe it's not your thing. Let the stone-age hams continue with CW, and move up and on to the digital modes. MultiPSK, while a bit cluttered and ugly, is a great program you can use. MixW is cleaner looking and very good, but not as many capabilities in the program. Move on and start having fun. JDB JOHN D wrote: I got nothing against CW, but being kept out of amateur radio for 40+ years cus I had difficulty learning the code, sucks. Finally, I got enough right to barely pass the 5 wpm test. Still can't find anybody slow enough for me to copy on the air. If I ever get good enough to use it, I'll try a few homebrew transmitter projects. I expect there are some technically competent people who might be interested in amateur radio, but have no interest in learning code. John Lighten up. There's room for everyone. I love CW but I have no illusions about it's ultimate capabilities. It's just FUN! Looking forward to experimenting with digital, too. I'd do more SSB if only I knew what to say. hihi John AB8WH |
Eliminating CW will just give retards HF, it won't modernize the service.
Proof: "an_old_friend" wrote in ups.com: it is our right and everybody else right that any restriction to our access to public spectrum be "neccisary and proper" (one of 3 clauses in the constitution that give the power to regulate the airwave to the govet at all) otherwise the 10 reserving all right and power to the sates or the people applies modifing that is the thrid place where the consititution of US touches on this issue mby making the constitution and the TREATIES made the supreme law of the land according the Govt lost the POWER to impose Morse Code test on the ARS unless it can be justified under some other powere of the Constitution I find it interesting that the ProCode tes crowd has such disrespect for that document |
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.
"J. D. B." wrote in
: Sorry Blow Code, but you cannot turn back the hands of time. The 13 & 20 WPM tests are gone forever. And soon, the CW testing requirement will be eliminated completely. It's the will of the majority. It's evolution. You can whine, cry and carry on all you want about the CW testing requirement. It is going the way of the buggy whip, the Ford Model-T, dinosaurs, the carrier pigeons, and a host of other old, outdated, and unnecessary things of the past. Good Bye and Good Riddance. Spoken like a true appliance operator. If there is any crying and whining after CW is gone, it will be by phonies wondering why their bands sound like CB. SC |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com