Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 26th 06, 03:12 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Dan Richardson
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

Did someone say this guy is an Elmer? Looks like he runs a business
with a lot of front doors.


Hi Owen,

Buck wrote a column in CQ magazine for awhile a few years back and
abruptly left. Don't know the reason, but I did read some of his
writings and some were just plain nonsense. For example he advised his
readers that they needed to tune their transmission line if they
wanted the antenna to work properly. After a few like that I just
stopped reading his stuff.

By the looks of his antenna advertisements I made the right decision.

73,
Danny,
K6MHE


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 25th 06, 03:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

wrote:
The BuxComm Antenna Company sells what it calls an All Band Coax-fed
Dipole.

http://www.commparts.com/catalog/pro...ffad91005875fb

When I clicked on it, it said "product not found".
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 25th 06, 04:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
gravity
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

PHP!

http://www.commparts.com/catalog/ima...ts/8010ABD.gif

i'm too lazy to provide more links.

Gravity


  #4   Report Post  
Old June 26th 06, 11:49 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
KC1DI
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

wrote:
The BuxComm Antenna Company sells what it calls an All Band Coax-fed
Dipole.

http://www.commparts.com/catalog/pro...ffad91005875fb


It consists of 135 ft. of wire, a balun at the center feed point, and
the RG 8X coax transmission line. I don't claim to know a whole lot
about antennas, but this configuration is contrary to everything that I
have read about feeding mutiband antennas. When I wrote to the company
with a question about this, I received a response from K4ABT, Buck
Rogers himself. He attached to his note a section from the ARRL Antenna
Book, which seems to indicate that coax should not be used with this
type of antenna if one wants to use it as a multibander. I have a lot
of respect for Buck, based on his years of Elmering a lot of us through
his articles. But this one has me stumped. Any input will be
appreciated.


My opinion would be that you'd be much better off if you want a single
wire antenna fed with coax going with one of the off center fed models.
the SWR is much better on many bands than the center fed model.

But if you must have a center fed model then you'll need to feed
it with open wire line of some sort .. coax just is not going to perform
well for you in a single wire all band dublet. the Losses on most bands
are not good.

73 Dave kc1di
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 26th 06, 10:19 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Steve N.
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

Ooooo Saw the call and had to comment...

I have a 40M inverted Vee up around 35 ft. . I have had out of state
contacts on 75, 40(DX), 30(DX), 17, 15, 10 and 6. Is it a "good" antenna?

I wish I had better, but it "works". Do I think it is a great antenna? No.
Do I think it can be called efficient on the other bands? No. Do I think
it has lots of lobes on the higher frequencies? Yes. If I can hear them, I
can usually work them. OK by me... Do I have room for better? No.
I got much more than what I paid for $0.00. You can probably do better with
a "fan-type" dipole. I keep thinking I should at least add 75M wires and
20M wires. When I have time... . . . . . . . . . . .

The antenna in question is similar and just as inefficient on some bands and
has many lobes on others. It'll get you on the air if this is what you want
/ can afford.

Dave... I used to talk with KC9DI on 2M. We'd say the calls as fast as we
could, just to confuse the random listener...(:-)

73, Steve, K9DCI



"KC1DI" wrote in message
...
wrote:
The BuxComm Antenna Company sells what it calls an All Band Coax-fed
Dipole.


http://www.commparts.com/catalog/pro...ffad91005875fb


It consists of 135 ft. of wire, a balun at the center feed point, and
the RG 8X coax transmission line. I don't claim to know a whole lot
about antennas, but this configuration is contrary to everything that I
have read about feeding mutiband antennas. When I wrote to the company
with a question about this, I received a response from K4ABT, Buck
Rogers himself. He attached to his note a section from the ARRL Antenna
Book, which seems to indicate that coax should not be used with this
type of antenna if one wants to use it as a multibander. I have a lot
of respect for Buck, based on his years of Elmering a lot of us through
his articles. But this one has me stumped. Any input will be
appreciated.


My opinion would be that you'd be much better off if you want a single
wire antenna fed with coax going with one of the off center fed models.
the SWR is much better on many bands than the center fed model.

But if you must have a center fed model then you'll need to feed
it with open wire line of some sort .. coax just is not going to perform
well for you in a single wire all band dublet. the Losses on most bands
are not good.

73 Dave kc1di





  #6   Report Post  
Old June 26th 06, 07:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????


wrote:
The BuxComm Antenna Company sells what it calls an All Band Coax-fed
Dipole.

http://www.commparts.com/catalog/pro...ffad91005875fb


It consists of 135 ft. of wire, a balun at the center feed point, and
the RG 8X coax transmission line.


A true coax fed "dipole" needs to see a 50 ohm load on
any of the bands to be used. Well, unless you like to lose
a lot of power on some bands. :/ So it would be better to
use an auto tuner at the feedpoint. It would be even better
to decide what bands you *really* intend to use, and run
dipole legs for each band in parallel. Spread wide apart
is better than stacking them on top of each other with
spreaders.
The antenna as they sell it is pretty micky mouse for an
"all band coax fed dipole". As one mentioned, the loss on
40m could be large if you feed with coax to a high Z load.
The antenna they sell would be best run using ladder line
all the way to a tuner, or tuned by length. Seems like you
say they mentioned this, but then why buy the uneeded
coax, choke, etc that you would end up discarding. ??
MK

  #7   Report Post  
Old June 27th 06, 11:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Band Coax-fed Dipole ??????????

wrote:
The BuxComm Antenna Company sells what it calls an All Band Coax-fed
Dipole.

http://www.commparts.com/catalog/pro...ffad91005875fb


It consists of 135 ft. of wire, a balun at the center feed point,


How did you conclude that the feed point is at the center? The lengths
of the sides are labeled only "L1" and "L2" on the drawing.

and
the RG 8X coax transmission line. I don't claim to know a whole lot
about antennas, but this configuration is contrary to everything that I
have read about feeding mutiband antennas. When I wrote to the company
with a question about this, I received a response from K4ABT, Buck
Rogers himself. He attached to his note a section from the ARRL Antenna
Book, which seems to indicate that coax should not be used with this
type of antenna if one wants to use it as a multibander. I have a lot
of respect for Buck, based on his years of Elmering a lot of us through
his articles. But this one has me stumped. Any input will be
appreciated.


I believe the antenna will be quite inefficient on some if not all
bands, either by accident (a balun which becomes lossy when confronted
with extreme impedances) or intent (a resistor inside the "balun"
container). If so, it's possible you'll get a reasonable match on all
bands, and nearly certain that you'll be able to talk to some people
when using it. But it also means that your signal will be considerably
weaker than it would be if you were using an efficient antenna.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna RHF Shortwave 2 April 18th 06 10:21 PM
I Want Another Antenna Lenny Shortwave 4 January 23rd 06 10:12 PM
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 November 4th 05 06:13 PM
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! RHF Shortwave 0 November 2nd 05 11:14 AM
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection § Dr. Artaud § Shortwave 71 April 26th 05 04:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017