| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave wrote:
"Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:11:42 -0700, Richard Clark wrote: On the other hand, at HF the ratio between reflection and refraction varies. There are times when both occur. During those times the portion of the incident ray that is reflected returns to earth, while the portion that is refracted continues on through the ionosphere into space and never returns. I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable on the But is it actually reflection? no, it is actually a refraction. but it is useful sometimes to model it as a reflection from a slightly higher level. that makes computation of angles of incidence and height a bit easier. If the end result is that the wave returns back to earth, why is this not termed reflection? Even if it is the result of several and/or continuous refractions that result in a return of the wave from the 2nd medium to the 1st, i.e., they sum to result in a reflected angle, seems to me reflection is a good term. I understand that a curved surface is more complex but if the result is the same, ...? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| International Space Station School Contacts on Oct 5th, 6th 7th | General | |||
| International Space Station School Contacts on Oct 5th, 6th 7th | Shortwave | |||
| Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||