Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:43:35 -0000, "Dave" wrote:
you don't want to think 'loading coils' you want to think 'traps'. they are two very different animals. loading coils are simply inductors that make the wire look longer electrically so you don't need as much room. traps are resonant circuits that exhibit a very large impedance at their tuned frequency so that it cuts off part of the antenna. usually you use a trap for multi-band dipoles, the first trap out from the center is tuned to cut off the outside of the element at the highest frequency, and then at lower frequencies it looks more like a small inductor so helps a bit as a loading coil on the lower band. Yes, but the trap (which is a parallel tuned circuit) doesn't need to be resonant in one of the operating bands, and there are reasons for choosing resonance other than at an operating frequency. For example, you can design a 40/80 trapped antenna that uses a trap resonant around 6MHz. Such a configuration requires a bit more complex explanation than the trap "cutting off" part of the antenna (which it doesn't do anyway). Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Element Design with Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Loading Coils & Numbers | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |