Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" nospam@nospam wrote in message ... A normal ground plane is a large sheet of metal that reflects the radio wave emitted by the radiating element. If there are four radials, each a quarterwave long, do the radials form a ground plane? Or is there too much of a gap for them to form a ground plane? Effectively, yes. A metallic surface (your "sheet of metal") can be replaced by a partially metallic surface -- within limits. If you keep the size of any gap under 1/10 wavelength, the surface will appear solid. This I know from satellite reflector work. The use of four radials appears to be a compromise for using a solid surface, but it obviously works. The RF sees these radial wires and behaves like we want. I think adding more radials will always make a better counterpoise, but I also think you reach the point of diminishing returns pretty quickly. (We aren't the first ones to speculate about this, after all :-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |