Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all of the useful input.
Art where did you purchase your AO-Pro? Joel "Art Unwin KB9MZ" wrote in message m... Arie, I remember when you first spoke of your program on this newsgroup where I commended you for your sharing attitude. My computor was down at that time but I do remember the many comments given , all of which were good. I really should have noted the facts down as it appears to me that your program offers much more than any program on the market and is a formidable new height that competing programmers will have to overcome. Rest assured that I will be taking a closer look at your work since I believe that the optimisation tool is a prime requisite of any antenna evaluation program. Best Regards Art wrote in message . com... I have no experience with anything other than AO which I have used for many years. I purchased A.O. because it had the ability of analysing any given radiator over different quality grounds and also for it's ability to change the geometry of a radiator so that gain, swr, F/B e.t.c can be optimised depending on your requirement. So can 4nec2. It's optimizer was based on the same principles as AO. Furthermore it can (almost) automatically convert *.ant files to 4nec2 input files. (just specify your *.ant file as a 4nec2 input file). Besides that 4nec2 is based on the nec-2 core whereas AO was based on the mininec core, especially important when modeling 'close' to ground. It is also a great learning tool because you can see where major changes occur while the program runs that gives you insights as to what further changes you can present to the program and follow the computors progress as it changes geometries e.t.c. I would suggest to take a look at the 4nec2 'evaluate' option. With this you can stepwise change one or more antenna, ground, load or other dimensions and see what effect they have on far-field pattern or other antenna characteristics. I have just purchaes the A.O. Pro program which cost $300. This program is the same as the std A.O. program except it has many more pulses available e.t.c. 4nec2 max is 5000 segments for XP systems, max 11000 segments for none-XP systems As far as I am aware the A.O. program can achieve what most of the other programs can achieve whereas most other programs cannot achieve what A.O. can achieve which really tells the story. I would be very glad to know what you think could be added to 4nec2 to make it even better. Furthemore it might be usefull to know the following is also possible: - Switchable genetic based or traditional hil-climbing optimizer - 2D, 3D graphical- and chart- display of near-field data - Optional surface wave-data included in far-field. - Sophisticated Smith-chart display when using frequency sweep. - Interface to VOACAP propagation prediction freeware - CAD alike geometry editor for starting modeler (however not usable when optization is required, see help-file) - Nec-2 aware or default notepad editor also usable. One drawback might be the lack of a very comprehensive getting started and/or user manual, but you can always contact me in case of problems. Please don't interpret this as an advertisement. Just as an attempt to share some private-made software with others interested in antenna modeling and/or propagation prediction. Arie. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Best vertical 20m design? | Antenna |