Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear friends
It is usually said (in my country) that the double bazooka antenna is less noisy than a standard dipole. I think that there are not good reasons that endorse such a statement for noises coming from the far field (maybe it has some advantage with near field noises or maybe because its frequency response cures some pitfails of the associated receiver). I have looked for information in the net about this topica but I have not been lucky. I suppose that you have treated this topic at some time. If you can point me to a link to read about I would be very grateful to you. Also if you can give me your opinion in this respect. Thank you very much in advance Miguel (LU 6ETJ) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Double Bazooka? | Antenna | |||
Double Bazooka question | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment |