Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... lu6etj wrote: Dear friends It is usually said (in my country) that the double bazooka antenna is less noisy than a standard dipole. I think that there are not good reasons that endorse such a statement for noises coming from the far field (maybe it has some advantage with near field noises or maybe because its frequency response cures some pitfails of the associated receiver). I tested an IAC double bazooka, and it is no different than a regular dipole. It has very slightly less signal level, and very slightly more bandwidth. Not enough to worry about. No measurable difference in noise. 73 Tom We beat bazookas to death here years ago. Don't waste your time. 73 H. NQ5H |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Double Bazooka? | Antenna | |||
Double Bazooka question | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment |