| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
lu6etj wrote:
But do I think: is it possible that all those friends that are enthusiastic of the bazooka are affirming foolishness? They say: -With the bazooka we listen stations that we don't with the plain dipole, and this affirmatiotn point to a better SNR... The Double Bazooka is probably quieter than a plain dipole because, unlike a plain dipole, there is a DC path between all points in the antenna thus minimizing the effects of precipitation static. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Double Bazooka? | Antenna | |||
| Double Bazooka question | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||