Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in
: If you are considering a new vertical antenna, instead of guesswork and copying somebody else's un-thought-out efforts, download program RADIAL_3 from website below. The program assists with choosing an economic length and number of shallow-buried ground radials. It takes a new look at how radials work by considering them to be lossy, single-wire transmission lines, open-circuit at the other end. RADIAL_3 is a self contained file, 55 kilibytes. Easy to use. No training needed. Download in a few seconds and run immediately. Very nice. But one thing I have noticed is that radial effectiveness begins to fall off at a distance from the antenna very similar to its height. This seems to be due to capacitive coupling between the top of the antenna and the radials. Does your algorithm take this effect into consideration? I modelled an antenna I used to use and the results did seem consistent with the behaviour, though. Actually I used to use two of them, and actually had a gain over a single perfect-ground antenna. Not a LARGE gain, but still, useful. More useful was the fact that I could control the take-off angle and pattern to the point where the antenna actually sounded about 10db louder than a low dipole--at distances of 1000 mi or more. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna |