| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Walter Maxwell" wrote The graphs reporting BLE's measurements are pretty conclusive. In addition, the BLE paper is the basis on which the FCC set the requirements for the ground systems on all AM BC stations since 1939 ========================================== My point is that when there is a sufficient number of radials of sufficient length to approach a nearly-perfect ground, the ground characteristics beneath the radials are irrelevant within the area they cover in determining the terminal impedance and efficiency of the radiator. Therefore, the different gr ound characteristics that prevail as the frequency increases above 3.5 MHz are also irrelevant. Walt, W2DU ============================================ Dear Walt, At risk of upsetting a great number of patriotic USA citizens, all BLE hero-worshippers, I admit to having speed-read BLE's lengthy paper some years back. Their conclusion, that with a sufficiant number and length of radials the ground characteristics are irrelevant, is so glaringly apparent they could have stayed in their offices and saved a great deal of expense and copper wire. I am reminded of John Cleese's remark "They must have had first-class honors degrees in stating the bleeding obvious". Because BL&E omitted to measure ground conductivity and permittivity on the site their conclusion amounted to making a virtue out of a vice and Marzipan the Magician's magic number of 120 came into existence. Their sponsors should have made them go back to finish the job. In the absence of any other information at the time, the fact of irrelevance was of interest to LF and MF broadcasters with money to burn, but it was, and still is, of no use to radio amateurs, confined to the HF bands with limited purses, small back yards and XYL's to keep happy. My small program Radial_3 has been singled out and I have been accused of disagreeing in a disruptive, almost criminal manner with BL&E's conclusions. This is patently untrue! The program has nothing to do with BL&E except that it deals with a similar subject in terms appropriate to amateurs and draws its own independent conclusions. Your absence caused a little worry. Glad to hear you were only working. ---- Reg. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Radials | Antenna | |||
| Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||