Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:24:02 +0100, "Reg Edwards"
wrote: "Walter Maxwell" wrote The graphs reporting BLE's measurements are pretty conclusive. In addition, the BLE paper is the basis on which the FCC set the requirements for the ground systems on all AM BC stations since 1939 ========================================== My point is that when there is a sufficient number of radials of sufficient length to approach a nearly-perfect ground, the ground characteristics beneath the radials are irrelevant within the area they cover in determining the terminal impedance and efficiency of the radiator. Therefore, the different gr ound characteristics that prevail as the frequency increases above 3.5 MHz are also irrelevant. Walt, W2DU ============================================ Dear Walt, At risk of upsetting a great number of patriotic USA citizens, all BLE hero-worshippers, I admit to having speed-read BLE's lengthy paper some years back. Their conclusion, that with a sufficiant number and length of radials the ground characteristics are irrelevant, is so glaringly apparent they could have stayed in their offices and saved a great deal of expense and copper wire. I am reminded of John Cleese's remark "They must have had first-class honors degrees in stating the bleeding obvious". Because BL&E omitted to measure ground conductivity and permittivity on the site their conclusion amounted to making a virtue out of a vice and Marzipan the Magician's magic number of 120 came into existence. Their sponsors should have made them go back to finish the job. In the absence of any other information at the time, the fact of irrelevance was of interest to LF and MF broadcasters with money to burn, but it was, and still is, of no use to radio amateurs, confined to the HF bands with limited purses, small back yards and XYL's to keep happy. My small program Radial_3 has been singled out and I have been accused of disagreeing in a disruptive, almost criminal manner with BL&E's conclusions. This is patently untrue! The program has nothing to do with BL&E except that it deals with a similar subject in terms appropriate to amateurs and draws its own independent conclusions. Your absence caused a little worry. Glad to hear you were only working. ---- Reg. Reg, I appreciate your worry about my absence. However, concerning the 'obviousness' of the conditions when there are enough radials to simulate perfect ground, you must remember that it was not 'obvious' in 1937. Prior to that time most BC 'aerials' were in the form of a 'T', a horizontal wire (top-hat loading) supported by two towers, dangling a vertical wire (the radiator) from the center, down to the antenna tuner. The 'ground' system was a wire counterpoise, because very little was known about any other type of 'ground' to work the vertical against. Brown originated the concept of radials to improve the conductivity (meaning reducing the resistance) of the ground, simply to avoid the construction of a messy arrangement of wires to get tangled up in. But before presenting the suggestion of radials to the world he proved it would work by performing the BLE experiment. Brown also is responsible for the tower antennas being of uniform shape over its entire length, where before it was customary to use the diamond shape. With the diamond shape the field strength measurements didn't follow the theory. Using models for measurements he determined that the current on the diamond shape does not flow uniformly, which resulted in undesirable radiation patterns. He then demonstated that when the tower construction was of uniform cross section the current became uniform and the radiation patterns became uniform and more predictable and useful. After proving the concept with models, he worked with John Leitch, chief engineer of WCAU Philadelphia, in proving that it worked with full-size towers. The WCAU tower was diamond shaped. The experiments with WCAU, and subsequently with a tower of uniform cross section, proved the concept to be correct. The result of Brown's experiment with the shape of the tower is that as of 1940, the FCC mandated use of towers with uniform cross section for all new installations. In addtion, no changes of any kind in the transmitting system were permitted in stations that didn't already have a tower with uniform cross section until the present antenna system was changed to one having uniform cross section. Brown's influence on BC antenna systems is legendary. He also patented the concept of using loading coils to shorten the physical length of towers. Some towers that followed his lead have insulators between sections and an inductance connecting them. Brown's article, "Directional Antennas," appearing in a 1937 issue of the IRE, formed the theoretical basis for all directional BC antennas Brown also invented and patented the ground plane antenna for VHF and UHF. All of his antenna experimentation was as an engineer with RCA. It was a great experience for me to have worked in Brown's antenna lab along with guys like Jess Epstein, O.M. Woodward, and Donald Peterson. Walt,W2DU |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna |