Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne" wrote understand the behavior of actual implementations that lie somewhere between the extremes you pointed out. In other words, what gets you the most bang for the buck.... How fast does performance change with increased radial length and number of radials. =================================== That's exactly what program RADIAL_3 is intended to help you with. All the user has to do is convert radiating efficiency into bucks. The higher the radiating efficiency the more bucks it will cost, the greater the length of wire, and the more painful the back ache. It's a matter of diminishing returns. ---- .................................................. .......... Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp .................................................. .......... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna |