| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:32:08 -0500, "hasan schiers"
wrote: The best study I've seen is in both the ARRL Antenna Handbook and in ON4UN's Low Band DX'ing Handbook. I think it was a 3 station that came up with a method (consistent with BL&E) that gave a simple formula for putting down the optimum number and length of radials, for a given length of radial wire available. I used that study to originally arrive at 50' long radials at 80m. This gave tip to tip separation of about 3 or 4 feet on 80m, which met his criteria. The material above specifically answers the question: how do you get the best bang for the buck for a given amount of available radial wire. You can find the article and the formula in the August 2004 QST. Danny, K6MHE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Radials | Antenna | |||
| Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||