Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's what the EZNEC manual says: "Horizontal wires should not
be placed exactly on the ground, but should be at least 1/1000 wavelength above (and in the case of EZNEC/4, also below) the ground." Cecil, Probably the 1/1000 WL limit contains a safety margin. This does not appear to be addressed by either the NEC 2, or NEC 4 user manual. Cebik's book "Intermediate Antenna Modeling", p 1-12, states: "The minimum height for wires above a Sommerfeld-Norton ground has two dimensions. The first relates the height above ground limit to the wire radius. The wire height (h) should be several times the wire radius (a), that is, h~a. As well, the minimum height is related to the wavelength for the frequency in use: (h^2 + a^2)^(1/2)10^(-6)Lambda. If a is very small compared to h, the wires may approach 10^(-6) Lambda toward ground. ......reflection Coefficient approximation.... .... the general recommendation is that ...... horizontal wires should be () 0.4 Lambda above ground". Obviously, from the manual quote, EZNEC can invoke a Sommerfeld-Norton ground. Since I do not have GNEC I usually test my NEC 4 models with NEC-Win Pro. Interestingly NEC-Win Pro actually runs, with no errors, on below ground wires. The results are usually pretty weird though. 73, Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna |