| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
They've shown that with about 100 radials of 0.4 lamba length the result is almost perfect ground, regardless of the ground conditions beneath the radials. I contend that using the radial setup as described above will always result in a near-perfect ground at any HF frequency, with close to 100 percent efficiency. Would you not agree? Walt, W2DU ====================================== My dear Walt, I haver never disagreed. How can one disagree with a statement of the bleeding obvious? Indeed, my program RADIAL3 confirms it. And so will NEC4 if you will allow it time to generate some results. ----- Reg, G4FGQ. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
| Radials | Antenna | |||