Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
snip I'm told that for specific 200 kHz swaths, a 75S or KWM is a much better receiver than the 51S-1, which has a very promiscuous front end. Hi, I have an S/Line, KWM-2 and a 51S-1. The 51S-1 front end is fine if it sees 50 Ohms. It has a double-tuned front end which is quite selective when used with a proper antenna. If you must use a random wire antenna with a 51S-1, even an untuned preamp such as an E.F. Johnson electronic TR switch will help the front end perform as designed. Below 2 MHz, the 51S-1 is insensitive, and was intended to be used with an external antenna tuner/ source follower for 50 Ohm input to the receiver. My only gripe against my 51S-1 is that the S/meter zero drifts quite a bit, and I don't look forward to chasing down a possibly leaky coupling capacitor in the IF circuit. 73, Ed Knobloch |