RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Boatanchors (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/)
-   -   FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/112818-fyi-origin-boatanchor.html)

Caveat Lector January 1st 07 04:52 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October 1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files here at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL



K3HVG January 1st 07 06:32 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
I believe that Version I and II are correct. Only the timeline may be
subject to query. There was quite a disdain for certain B/A's in the
40's and 50's and they were, indeed, referred to as B/A's. In 1946, QST
said the BC-375 and 191 were useful for parts only and one would suffer
a pink ticket from the FCC seconds after it was put on the air. I also
have one surplus conversion manual that states of the BC-640 (a
heavy-duty VHF transmitter): "This unit will generate TVI even when
turned off...". That was then and now is now.... Yesterdays junk is
today's treasured B/A. And... don't even THINK about adding an S-meter
to that BC-342...! Hi!!
de K3HVG


Michael Black January 1st 07 07:21 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
K3HVG ) writes:
I believe that Version I and II are correct. Only the timeline may be
subject to query. There was quite a disdain for certain B/A's in the
40's and 50's and they were, indeed, referred to as B/A's. In 1946, QST
said the BC-375 and 191 were useful for parts only and one would suffer
a pink ticket from the FCC seconds after it was put on the air. I also
have one surplus conversion manual that states of the BC-640 (a
heavy-duty VHF transmitter): "This unit will generate TVI even when
turned off...". That was then and now is now.... Yesterdays junk is
today's treasured B/A. And... don't even THINK about adding an S-meter
to that BC-342...! Hi!!
de K3HVG


But 3 is an absolute. I've seen that issue of CQ, well I did read
the letter in CQ though I can't verify the issue, and there was such
a letter.

And 2 could actually be a variant on 3, since it is far vaguer (no
magazine mentioned, no specifics, no names).

In other words, the one about CQ can be verified, while the others
are fairly nebulous.

Michael VE2BVW


aalaan January 1st 07 07:29 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
And there was me thinking that it was only the neighbours who were convinced
my gear was generating TVI when in fact it was off!

"K3HVG" wrote in message
...
I believe that Version I and II are correct. Only the timeline may be
subject to query. There was quite a disdain for certain B/A's in the 40's
and 50's and they were, indeed, referred to as B/A's. In 1946, QST said
the BC-375 and 191 were useful for parts only and one would suffer a pink
ticket from the FCC seconds after it was put on the air. I also have one
surplus conversion manual that states of the BC-640 (a heavy-duty VHF
transmitter): "This unit will generate TVI even when turned off...". That
was then and now is now.... Yesterdays junk is today's treasured B/A.
And... don't even THINK about adding an S-meter to that BC-342...! Hi!!
de K3HVG




K3HVG January 1st 07 08:03 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
Error---- I should have said Item II and III. The CQ issue mentioned
does indeed refer to B/A's. Item I would, then, continue to be only
conjecture....


Martin Potter January 4th 07 12:37 AM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
"Caveat Lector" ) writes:
... they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc.


Tubes don't weigh much.
Martin VE3OAT







Caveat Lector January 4th 07 01:03 AM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 

"Martin Potter" wrote in message
...
"Caveat Lector" ) writes:
... they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc.


Tubes don't weigh much.
Martin VE3OAT


A lot more than IC's (:-)
CL



John S. January 8th 07 07:32 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 

Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October 1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files here at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL


I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.


Caveat Lector January 8th 07 07:52 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
Well it is documented as 1956
Do you have a previous documented date ??

Many things are uttered thruout the ages but origins are typically sited
from a documented source
73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...

Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments
of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due
to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic
instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October
1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files here
at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL


I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.




John S. January 8th 07 08:12 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
Well, that was my point. It is all but impossible to tie phrases like
Boatanchor back to the who it originated with. Sure we can find a
magazine where the phrase appeared, but who knows where the author
heard the phrase.

The most we can say right now is that 1956 is that is the earliest date
we have found the phrase Boatanchor in print. It is not in any way
synonymous with the origin of the phrase.


Caveat Lector wrote:
Well it is documented as 1956
Do you have a previous documented date ??

Many things are uttered thruout the ages but origins are typically sited
from a documented source
73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...

Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments
of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due
to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic
instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October
1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files here
at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL


I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.



Caveat Lector January 8th 07 08:40 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
You win John (;-)

73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...
Well, that was my point. It is all but impossible to tie phrases like
Boatanchor back to the who it originated with. Sure we can find a
magazine where the phrase appeared, but who knows where the author
heard the phrase.

The most we can say right now is that 1956 is that is the earliest date
we have found the phrase Boatanchor in print. It is not in any way
synonymous with the origin of the phrase.


Caveat Lector wrote:
Well it is documented as 1956
Do you have a previous documented date ??

Many things are uttered thruout the ages but origins are typically sited
from a documented source
73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...

Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of
BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic
equipments
of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy
frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors
due
to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query
"As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic
instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October
1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a
"Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics
or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files
here
at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be
tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If
any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them.
Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL

I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.





Alan Douglas January 8th 07 10:58 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
Hi,
The followup to the CQ letter was in the February 1957 issue, p.82,
a series of three photos showing the conversion in action.

Alan

John S. January 9th 07 01:20 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
And the question you were looking for an answer to was....?????


Caveat Lector wrote:
You win John (;-)

73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...
Well, that was my point. It is all but impossible to tie phrases like
Boatanchor back to the who it originated with. Sure we can find a
magazine where the phrase appeared, but who knows where the author
heard the phrase.

The most we can say right now is that 1956 is that is the earliest date
we have found the phrase Boatanchor in print. It is not in any way
synonymous with the origin of the phrase.


Caveat Lector wrote:
Well it is documented as 1956
Do you have a previous documented date ??

Many things are uttered thruout the ages but origins are typically sited
from a documented source
73 CL

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...

Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of
BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic
equipments
of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy
frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors
due
to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query
"As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic
instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October
1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a
"Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics
or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files
here
at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be
tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If
any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them.
Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL

I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.




Jon Teske January 9th 07 06:33 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 
On 8 Jan 2007 11:32:47 -0800, "John S." wrote:


Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October 1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files here at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL


I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.


I remember reading Version III when it came out (I was a newly
licensed kid of 14.) I think that was during the era when Wayne Green
W2NSD (later founder of "73" magazine) was the CQ editor and it is
indicative of his humor. I remember that he had also done a couple of
photos in this or a subsequent issue on the actual conversion process
outlined in the article.

As to whether this is the actual origin of the term, I would have no
idea and like the origin of the word "ham" to describe radio
afficionados of the licensed variety, the origin is probably
unprovable. Version III was at least the first time I heard the term.
During my government career which had a lot to do with radio and
radios, I remember cribbing this definition when I was asked what to
do with a bunch of excess radio equipment. I was in Guantanamo and we
had replaced a bunch of obsolete equipment. The fellows at the
facility I was upgrading asked what they should do with the old
equipment (a bunch of demodulators.) The regulations stated that they
were to box the stuff up and send it to a Navy depot. I wanted to
avoid that at all cost since every time I wanted to upgrade Navy
facilities with state of the art demods, I would get messages from the
"Big" Navy that they wouldn't fund the upgrades because they had over
200 of these old beasts in depots. While the "old beast" would sorta
do the job, it wasn't really a demod, but rather a tunable low
frequency voltmeter of 1940's vintage (this was in the early 80's) and
one was required for each channel, so a 24 channel system required
about 8 tall racks for installation vice a single small box for the
modern equivalent. I told the Commanding Officer I could suggest two
solutions...one was the "boatanchor", quite literally for the sailing
club to use a mooring anchors. I then asked the CO when was the last
time he had an emergency destruction drill. He could not recall ever
having one, so we took these old kluges out to the gunnery range,
stacked them up and put Thermite charges on the top of each stack and
reduced them to molten metal and glass. In our report to the "Big
Navy" we simply notated that the units were transferred to "a training
function" and would not be returned to depot.

W3JT

Caveat Lector January 9th 07 07:05 PM

FYI: Origin Of BoatAnchor
 

"Jon Teske" wrote in message
...
On 8 Jan 2007 11:32:47 -0800, "John S." wrote:


Caveat Lector wrote:
Whether legend, myth, or fact, here is the best guess of the origin of
BA

THREE VERSIONS -- Opinions From The Internet.

Version I -- During World War II, Military Radio Techs used the term
BoatAnchor as they struggled with the huge, heavy, electronic
equipments of
the day -- full of transformers, tubes etc. Also the US Navy frequently
marked electronic gear with an anchor. After the war -- tons of the
equipment appeared on the surplus market and was dubbed BoatAnchors due
to
the reasons above - one or both.

Version II -- After WWII a national magazine editor answered a query "As
what to do with an outdated heavy, large, surplus electronic
instrument?"
and answered "Tie a line to it and use it as a BoatAnchor"

Version III A letter to the editor appeared on page 16 of the October
1956
issue of CQ and was as follows: Gentlemen: I recently acquired a "Signal
Corps Wireless Set. No. 19 MK II Transceiver." Are there schematics or
conversion data for this rig? Any info will be appreciated.

The editor replied: The only conversion we seem to have on the files
here at
CQ calls for 100 feet of 1" Manila line, one end of which is to be tied
securely around the MK II Transceiver.

This then converts the unit into a fine anchor for a small boat. If any
readers have better conversions we will be glad to hear about them. Ed.

Happy New Year -- CL


I'm sure that II and III could be verified as having been written after
reading microfillm copies of old magazines. I doubt that anyone could
come up with the origin of the term Boatanchor however. Who was the
first guy in supply to have uttered that or more coloful descriptives
as they hoisted them onto 6x6 trucks some place in the pacific.


I remember reading Version III when it came out (I was a newly
licensed kid of 14.) I think that was during the era when Wayne Green
W2NSD (later founder of "73" magazine) was the CQ editor and it is
indicative of his humor. I remember that he had also done a couple of
photos in this or a subsequent issue on the actual conversion process
outlined in the article.

As to whether this is the actual origin of the term, I would have no
idea and like the origin of the word "ham" to describe radio
afficionados of the licensed variety, the origin is probably
unprovable. Version III was at least the first time I heard the term.
During my government career which had a lot to do with radio and
radios, I remember cribbing this definition when I was asked what to
do with a bunch of excess radio equipment. I was in Guantanamo and we
had replaced a bunch of obsolete equipment. The fellows at the
facility I was upgrading asked what they should do with the old
equipment (a bunch of demodulators.) The regulations stated that they
were to box the stuff up and send it to a Navy depot. I wanted to
avoid that at all cost since every time I wanted to upgrade Navy
facilities with state of the art demods, I would get messages from the
"Big" Navy that they wouldn't fund the upgrades because they had over
200 of these old beasts in depots. While the "old beast" would sorta
do the job, it wasn't really a demod, but rather a tunable low
frequency voltmeter of 1940's vintage (this was in the early 80's) and
one was required for each channel, so a 24 channel system required
about 8 tall racks for installation vice a single small box for the
modern equivalent. I told the Commanding Officer I could suggest two
solutions...one was the "boatanchor", quite literally for the sailing
club to use a mooring anchors. I then asked the CO when was the last
time he had an emergency destruction drill. He could not recall ever
having one, so we took these old kluges out to the gunnery range,
stacked them up and put Thermite charges on the top of each stack and
reduced them to molten metal and glass. In our report to the "Big
Navy" we simply notated that the units were transferred to "a training
function" and would not be returned to depot.

W3JT


Oh wow great story "training function" no less
Thanks for adding to the lore.
CL




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com