Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message One of the ones I always wondered about came in the sixties and I'm pretty sure was still in the catalog in 1971 when I would have seen my first Heath catalog. It was a general coverage receiver, and looked a lot like the average low end receiver. But it used an IF in the 1600KHz range, using a two-crystal lattice filter. I've always been curious about it because of that high IF which obviously would make an improvement for the highest band in terms of image rejection compared to the usual cheap SW receiver. But I've never really seen anything about how the receiver was generally. A higher IF suggests something better, but it might have just been as bad as the usual low end SW receiver. Micahel VE2BVW Michael I believe my old HR-10 used an IF of 1680 kc with a simple 2-pole lattice filter. Of course that was ham coverage only.. Pete |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: $10> GENERAL RADIO TYPE No. 1803-B VACUUM TUBE VOLTMETER NR | Equipment | |||
FA: Amplex Model "C" Tube Type Radio - Antique Type - Quite Old | Swap | |||
FA=GENERAL RADIO type 722-DS9 VARIABLE CAP-NEW are $11K? | Equipment | |||
General Coverage Attic Antenna Suggestions ? | Shortwave | |||
General Coverage Attic Antenna Suggestions ? | Antenna |