Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey ) writes:
cmdr buzz corey wrote: On Apr 19, 9:28 am, (Michael Black) wrote: IN the sixties (and early seventies), it was common for the hobby electronic magazines to treat CB as a hobby. This was especially so for "Electronics Illustrated" that had quite a few construction articles, going from simple to quite sophisticated. In the early sixties I ordered one of those cb kits from an electronics magazine. It consisted of a crudely punched chassis, a bag of parts and a schematic. I never did get it to work. I thought building a kit CB transceiver was illegal due to the type acceptance issue? Certainly Heathkit got around the issue with their full blown CB set(s) by having the transmitter arrive as a preassembled module. But I thought there was a CB "Benton Harbor Lunchbox" for a while, and I can't imagine they would have a module for such a low end unit. So perhaps the type acceptance came a bit later? I can't remember (not that I was aware of such things at the time, but I have read lots of back issues of magazines). In the very early days, there was equipment being made out of people's garages. So either the rules were more lax then, or from the outside there were companies selling things that weren't legal. Michael VE2BVW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:38:55 +0000, Michael Black wrote:
I thought building a kit CB transceiver was illegal due to the type acceptance issue? .... So perhaps the type acceptance came a bit later? I can't remember (not that I was aware of such things at the time, but I have read lots of back issues of magazines). ISTR: - Heath equipment was acceptable contingent on being assembled according to the instructions. There was a notice in some of the manuals about that - ISTR some devices where one part was a Part 15 label which the builder was to sign & date & stick to the completed kit certifying they'd followed the instructions. - It was legal to homebrew CB gear in the early days of the service, but that rule was changed - well before the 1960s. (I'm not sure it was *ever* legal to homebrew 27MHz CB gear, it may have only been legal for the old 470MHz stuff) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:34:00 +0000, Doug Smith W9WI wrote: - It was legal to homebrew CB gear in the early days of the service, but that rule was changed - well before the 1960s. (I'm not sure it was *ever* legal to homebrew 27MHz CB gear, it may have only been legal for the old 470MHz stuff) It may not have been in the US, but before regulation and since deregulation, one can build up to 5 CB's and call them prototypes in .ca land, as long as they meet Industry Canada (then the Department of Communications) specifications. Maybe it's a Canuck rig? Cheers, __ Gregg |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just for clarification on my last post, info can be found in RSS210,
section 5.14 of Industry Canada's regulations. Home built for personal use, not prototypes. My err. Cheers, __ Gregg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Info wanted - R744A army VHF receiver (US made) | Boatanchors | |||
15-tube homebrew receiver for sale | Homebrew | |||
? INFO ? Info Tech M-6000 Multi-Mode Code Receiver | Shortwave | |||
Needed: Info or manual for Fisher 1800 Tube Receiver | Swap |