![]() |
HQ100 alignment
Hi all,
Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson |
HQ100 alignment
Hi,
Possibly 0.6 MHz, or 600KHz. Tuneup for most any RX is the same.... twiddle the coil at the low end of the scale, cap for the high. At least so I was taught. Cheers, __ Gregg |
HQ100 alignment
0.6 Mhz. I recently aligned a HQ145 and the frequency for the BC band is 0.6 Mhz.
/s/ DD, W1MCE Nelson Gietz wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson |
HQ100 alignment
On 9/11/07 9:37 PM, in article , "Nelson
Gietz" wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson you can download the manual from BAMA. 6 mHz is correct for one part of the alignment. It doesn't matter what the band is used for. http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/ |
HQ100 alignment
"Don Bowey" wrote in message ... On 9/11/07 9:37 PM, in article , "Nelson Gietz" wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson you can download the manual from BAMA. 6 mHz is correct for one part of the alignment. It doesn't matter what the band is used for. http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/ Thanks geek, Deek, and Don; I'm using the BAMA manual. Still think a decimal is not showing up on at least part of this copy. Will try to psych it out. Cheers, Nelson |
HQ100 alignment
Nelson Gietz wrote:
Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson Nelson, I'm looking at an original HQ-100 book. There us no reference in the book for an adjustment at 6 MHz. As I read the alignment pictorial (Figure 7), the left rear-most can (T-1 antenna) is adjusted at .6 MHz. The right, front-most can (L-3 oscillator)is adjusted as follows: top slug is adjusted at .6 MHz, the bottom slug at 1.65 MHz. Does this help? |
HQ100 alignment
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:59:59 -0500, Nelson Gietz wrote:
"Don Bowey" wrote in message ... On 9/11/07 9:37 PM, in article , "Nelson Gietz" wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson you can download the manual from BAMA. 6 mHz is correct for one part of the alignment. It doesn't matter what the band is used for. http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/ Thanks geek, Deek, and Don; I'm using the BAMA manual. Still think a decimal is not showing up on at least part of this copy. Will try to psych it out. Cheers, Nelson Cheers! Good luck with the old girl :-) __ Gregg |
HQ100 alignment
"K3HVG" wrote in message ... Nelson Gietz wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got detailed and correct info on aligning a Hammarlund HQ100? The admittedly poor copy I have seems to advise tuning the RF input transformer T1 at 6 mHz, which is impossible... it's the BC band. Maybe a decimal disappeared on this print? Hopefully, Nelson Nelson, I'm looking at an original HQ-100 book. There us no reference in the book for an adjustment at 6 MHz. As I read the alignment pictorial (Figure 7), the left rear-most can (T-1 antenna) is adjusted at .6 MHz. The right, front-most can (L-3 oscillator)is adjusted as follows: top slug is adjusted at .6 MHz, the bottom slug at 1.65 MHz. Does this help? Yes, very much... that's exactly what I was hoping for. The BAMA Djvu and .pdf files are okay, but one does not show a decimal, and the other shows only a vestige... not much more than a pixel. If you blow it up enough on a graphics program, it's visible. That's a hazard with using scans, I guess. Along with some other things, it seems the primary on T1 got cooked at some time, and the rewind job was simply hand-spinning some enameled solid on there. It's in very good hands now, getting what I expect will be an excellent rewind... although we're still working out turn count and wire gauge for it. Nelson |
HQ100 alignment
If you're so inclined, and the re-wind isn't successful, give me the p/n
on the can and I'll see if I have one, here. I've had to scrap several beyond-all-hope Hammarlunds and maybe I have the correct can. de K3HVG |
HQ100 alignment
"K3HVG" wrote in message . .. If you're so inclined, and the re-wind isn't successful, give me the p/n on the can and I'll see if I have one, here. I've had to scrap several beyond-all-hope Hammarlunds and maybe I have the correct can. de K3HVG Thanks for the offer... I'll keep it in mind. After I sent the one off for rewind I was thinking maybe I should have looked inside the other three first. Continuity was good on all of them... but this one had been "rewound". Cheers, Nelson |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com