Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes, I must agree with Richard's well written explanation of the effects of overcoupling (more than critical coupling). However I do not believe that in the instance of the 453's 85kc IF cans that with the rods pushed all the way in that they became overcoupled. With resultant double peaked bandpass. This is of course is just my observation with a bit of practical measurment using relatively crude methods. It would seem then,to me, that the double peaked curve encountered with overcoupling (more than critical coupling) is, in this instance, not the condition that results in a narrower bandpass when the coils are moved further apart. During the glory days of TV service, IF alignment with sweep generators and oscilloscopes, it was quite fascinating to see theoretical bandpass tuning in the real world. Overcoupling was often (always?) used to achieve the necessary wide bandwith for a TV channel. While transformer coupling was not normally adjustable, the peaks and skirts of the quite wide bandpass could be moved around with the adjustments available, and measured with fairly simple equipment. But I digress (a lot, sorry) Old Chief Lynn A lot TV sets and other equipment with wide band IF's used stagger tuning. This works fine but is a PITA to align. As you say a sweep generator, markers, and a scope are the only way. Actually, I've found sweeep alignment of standard plain vanilla IF's is often helpful especially if you want to get the peak symmetrical. I've tried to find a schematic or other info on the BC-453 but have not so far been able to. Evidently the IF is different from other command sets. There is plenty of info on the other receivers and transmitters but somehow this one seems to have fallen through the cracks. Richard Knoppow Google found a rather poor schematic, but it doesn't provide much enlightening info on the 85kc IF cans. I think I got the schematic successfully posted on ABPR. Even when the 453 was a hot item, I could never find much that explained it's bandwidth adjustment. Just a few articles in 73, QST and what was that other popular ham rag? They just said pull the rod out. I, of course did pull one out. By the roots. But, no problem, there were plenty more available without attempting a repair. Used ones with a little mud, or having been stepped on were $5 or less. Oh, and yes, I guess that "stagger" tune was the common way that TV set IF's were (are?) broadbanded. Lynn, W7LTQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to set/hack Sony car stereos from Japanese tuning to US tuning? | Equipment | |||
How to set tuning on Sony car stereo from Japanese to US tuning...please help | Homebrew | |||
SB-230 tuning | Boatanchors | |||
FT-102 tuning? | Equipment | |||
FT-102 tuning? | Equipment |