Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin
Good on yah mate.. Now to express it another way the winding ratio of the diode transformer has to be such that when it reflects the diode and its load to the plate of the last IF, the plate circuit will see the correct impedance for the IF tube load. Transformers don't have impedance, only turns ratio to reflect back whatever impedance they see in accordance with the turns ratio. -- 73 Hank WD5JFR "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message m... "Time to stop rambling and ask if the ARRL article distinguished the IF transformers with different part numbers?" Yes The first and second stage transformers are designated "456 kc interstage if transformer, permeability-tuned (Millen 64456)". The third if transformer (to the diode detector) is designated "456 kc diode transformer, permeability-tuned (Millen 65454)". The schematic drawing for all three transformers are the same, but the secondary of the last transformer would be different to attain a lower impedance. 73, Colin K7FM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
UTC ls 55 transformers | Homebrew | |||
FS: Transformers, Transformers, Transformers . . . | Swap | |||
FS: Transformers | Swap | |||
WTB: IF transformers.. | Equipment | |||
WTB: IF transformers.. | Equipment |