LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 27th 09, 06:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 527
Default CONELRAD


"David G. Nagel" wrote in
message ...
Richard Kn

I'm afraid that 640khz _is_ the correct lower
frequency. Somewhere, buried in some archive, the
developmental documents for Conelrad may still exist and
may explain the choice of frequencies. I think mostly it
was to have a frequency that would be usable for any BC
station. I also don't remember (if I ever knew) the power
stations were supposed to use, I think quite low, perhaps
a couple of hundred watts.



You are right. That's what happens when you depend on
memory. Sorry for the error.

Dave


Memory? What's that?


--

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Info on Morrow CM-1 Conelrad Rec. K3HVG[_2_] Boatanchors 0 May 20th 07 08:55 AM
CONELRAD Bruce Wilson Shortwave 22 July 10th 06 11:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017