Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad
device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. with thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "George McLeod" wrote in message ... Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. with thanks If you go over to Yahoo! and check the Yahoo Groups for the Heathkit forum, you will probably someone there who can help. If you have a model number for the Heathkit it would helpful too. There is a German site that still has the Heath schematics available for download. Pete |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George McLeod wrote:
Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. What is this device? Does it automatically tune the radio to a CONELRAD frequency? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... George McLeod wrote: Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. What is this device? Does it automatically tune the radio to a CONELRAD frequency? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." to monitor AGC voltage on the monitor receiver. When The Heathkit was a model CA-1. It used a 2D21 thyratron the station went off the air, the thryatron fired and locked a relay which had contacts for the whatever notification device was being used. AGC sensitivity could be set from a volt or so to about -20 volts. Looked a bit like the QF-1 box. pete |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Knoppow wrote:
There was, I think, only one nationwide test, and a few local tests. It was quite possible to identify some of the individual stations by their sound and the key station could be identified by the higher audio quality. The system was a failure but contributed to the general panic about a possible Russian neucular attack. How was it a failure? The reason it was dropped, IMHO, was that by November of 1962, it became obvious that the Soviet Union was no longer dependent upon bombers to attack the U.S. Missiles had replaced bombers, and they don't need local radio stations to navigate. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Richard Knoppow wrote: There was, I think, only one nationwide test, and a few local tests. It was quite possible to identify some of the individual stations by their sound and the key station could be identified by the higher audio quality. The system was a failure but contributed to the general panic about a possible Russian neucular attack. How was it a failure? The reason it was dropped, IMHO, was that by November of 1962, it became obvious that the Soviet Union was no longer dependent upon bombers to attack the U.S. That's part of why it was a failure. The US invested a huge amount of money in defending against a bomber attack, and they continued investing that money years after it became clear that missiles were a more pressing threat. Missiles had replaced bombers, and they don't need local radio stations to navigate. Well, for that matter neither do bombers, if they are equipped with INS systems much like the missiles would be. In fact, bombers were probably more effective in an RF blackout, seeing as how they were navigated by human beings with maps and pilotage as well as by electronic systems. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Teske wrote:
On 25 Jan 2009 12:50:41 -0500, (Scott Dorsey) wrote: George McLeod wrote: Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. What is this device? Does it automatically tune the radio to a CONELRAD frequency? --scott I lived in this era. Back in the 1950's there was a program called CONtrol of ELectromagnetic RADiation. Subtitled CONELRAD. All AM radios (FM was in its commercial infancy, we only had Public Stations in the FM band) had little triangles with the Civil Defense logo at 640 Kcs and 1240 Kcs. [Kilocycles (per second) here is not accidental, Hertz, as a term to mean cycles per second, was not adopted until the mid-1960's.] In the event of an emergency, usually interpreted to be an attack upon us by the Russians (this WAS the McCarthy era after all) you were supposed to tune your AM radio to one of those two frequencies for information on what to do. Inplicit in that was that all other radiostations would get off the air so that they could not be used as homing devices for attacking aircraft. The fact that there were other methods to navigate was blithely ignored. About 1957, CONELRAD was expanded to include amateur radio stations and all stations were obliged by the FCC to have a CONELRAD monitor which would tell you that an emergency was declared, that you were to get your own station off the air, and like the rest of the population tune to 640 or 1240 AM. This ruling was more observed in the breach than the observance. And few amateur stations did anything about it. [My response...I was a teenager then...was to look for a mushroom cloud. If I saw one, I'd get off the air. :-) A few companies built add-on CONELRAD monitors. If I remember correctly, you attached the device to an ordinary AM radio which was already and always tuned to 640 or 1240 Kcs. (1240Kcs. actually happened to be the frequency for the station in my own hometown in Wisconsin.) When some keying signal came on, the CONELRAD monitor would alarm and then you were to get off the air. It didn't retune any radio to anything, it just told an alert went off as broadcast on one of those two frequencies...at least that was all a ham version did. In theory, you could just have a small radio playing in the background which supposedly would tell you the same thing. In actual tests, which were conducted from time to time, just as Emergency Service Tests are occasionally heard now. All of a regions stations got on one of those two frequencies (to confound the enemy's direction finders) and they had some sort of switching so that they all broadcast the same message from "Big Brother" but broadcast them in some sort of rotation. The few tests that I actually heard knocked our local station off the air, but the "emergency" broadcast itself was total gibberish because there were too few stations in our rural part of Wisconsin by day, and nighttime propagation was too screwy to provide any responsible path. I don't remember when CONELRAD died as I went off to college in 1960 and wasn't on the air very much and not at all when I was in school. It was dead when I got back on the air with any regularity after I had graduated.. Heathkit did indeed built such a monitoring kit. It was in the same size box as their famous QF-1 Q mulitiplier or their earliest SWR in-line monitor, one of the first with a Monimatch architecture. It cost somewhere between $10 and $20 as a kit IIRC, but that was too much allowance money for me to spend. Even as a teen, I had a keen sense for Governmental BS (which paid off well later as I was a career Federal Employee for 35 years in the intelligence world. You needed a steep skirted BS filter to work in that environment.) CONELRAD was one of the biggest governmental flops ever in the communications arena. Jon W3JT (K9CAH back then.) Jon; An excellent summation of CONELRAD. The only correction is the lower frequency. It was 620 Kcs which is half the upper frequency of 1240. This was for reception at the higher freq by use of the harmonic effect. When I was in high school in the late 50's we had a school fm broadcast station. Our CONELRAD detector was a standard receiver with an addon device that squawked when the carrier was lost. Our control station was Radio station WOWO in Fort Wayne IN. We tested the receiver every hour by pressing a phone jack in. This acted like the loss of carrier from WOWO and sounded a LOUD horn. When WOWO would loose it's carrier due to what ever it really got your heart going. We were in the middle of the great nuk war threat and never knew if or when the balloon would go up. HI HI.. CONELRAD operated by switching the active carrier of several radio stations around the country in a random sequence so that Soviet bombers could not use radio navigation to locate any specific target for bombing. I agree that CONELRAD and the whole CD effort, for that matter, was a total flop. Great PR but a flop never the less. Growing up just south of Cleveland OH and the later near Grissom AFB (a SAC base about 60 miles north of Indianapolis IN I held no expectations of surviving any nuk attack. Dave Nagel WD9BDZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David G. Nagel" wrote in message ... Jon Teske wrote: On 25 Jan 2009 12:50:41 -0500, (Scott Dorsey) wrote: George McLeod wrote: Would anyone have a circuit, or know where to find one, for the Conelrad device as marketed by Motorola and Heathkit. What is this device? Does it automatically tune the radio to a CONELRAD frequency? --scott I lived in this era. Back in the 1950's there was a program called CONtrol of ELectromagnetic RADiation. Subtitled CONELRAD. All AM radios (FM was in its commercial infancy, we only had Public Stations in the FM band) had little triangles with the Civil Defense logo at 640 Kcs and 1240 Kcs. [Kilocycles (per second) here is not accidental, Hertz, as a term to mean cycles per second, was not adopted until the mid-1960's.] In the event of an emergency, usually interpreted to be an attack upon us by the Russians (this WAS the McCarthy era after all) you were supposed to tune your AM radio to one of those two frequencies for information on what to do. Inplicit in that was that all other radiostations would get off the air so that they could not be used as homing devices for attacking aircraft. The fact that there were other methods to navigate was blithely ignored. About 1957, CONELRAD was expanded to include amateur radio stations and all stations were obliged by the FCC to have a CONELRAD monitor which would tell you that an emergency was declared, that you were to get your own station off the air, and like the rest of the population tune to 640 or 1240 AM. This ruling was more observed in the breach than the observance. And few amateur stations did anything about it. [My response...I was a teenager then...was to look for a mushroom cloud. If I saw one, I'd get off the air. :-) A few companies built add-on CONELRAD monitors. If I remember correctly, you attached the device to an ordinary AM radio which was already and always tuned to 640 or 1240 Kcs. (1240Kcs. actually happened to be the frequency for the station in my own hometown in Wisconsin.) When some keying signal came on, the CONELRAD monitor would alarm and then you were to get off the air. It didn't retune any radio to anything, it just told an alert went off as broadcast on one of those two frequencies...at least that was all a ham version did. In theory, you could just have a small radio playing in the background which supposedly would tell you the same thing. In actual tests, which were conducted from time to time, just as Emergency Service Tests are occasionally heard now. All of a regions stations got on one of those two frequencies (to confound the enemy's direction finders) and they had some sort of switching so that they all broadcast the same message from "Big Brother" but broadcast them in some sort of rotation. The few tests that I actually heard knocked our local station off the air, but the "emergency" broadcast itself was total gibberish because there were too few stations in our rural part of Wisconsin by day, and nighttime propagation was too screwy to provide any responsible path. I don't remember when CONELRAD died as I went off to college in 1960 and wasn't on the air very much and not at all when I was in school. It was dead when I got back on the air with any regularity after I had graduated.. Heathkit did indeed built such a monitoring kit. It was in the same size box as their famous QF-1 Q mulitiplier or their earliest SWR in-line monitor, one of the first with a Monimatch architecture. It cost somewhere between $10 and $20 as a kit IIRC, but that was too much allowance money for me to spend. Even as a teen, I had a keen sense for Governmental BS (which paid off well later as I was a career Federal Employee for 35 years in the intelligence world. You needed a steep skirted BS filter to work in that environment.) CONELRAD was one of the biggest governmental flops ever in the communications arena. Jon W3JT (K9CAH back then.) Jon; An excellent summation of CONELRAD. The only correction is the lower frequency. It was 620 Kcs which is half the upper frequency of 1240. This was for reception at the higher freq by use of the harmonic effect. When I was in high school in the late 50's we had a school fm broadcast station. Our CONELRAD detector was a standard receiver with an addon device that squawked when the carrier was lost. Our control station was Radio station WOWO in Fort Wayne IN. We tested the receiver every hour by pressing a phone jack in. This acted like the loss of carrier from WOWO and sounded a LOUD horn. When WOWO would loose it's carrier due to what ever it really got your heart going. We were in the middle of the great nuk war threat and never knew if or when the balloon would go up. HI HI.. CONELRAD operated by switching the active carrier of several radio stations around the country in a random sequence so that Soviet bombers could not use radio navigation to locate any specific target for bombing. I agree that CONELRAD and the whole CD effort, for that matter, was a total flop. Great PR but a flop never the less. Growing up just south of Cleveland OH and the later near Grissom AFB (a SAC base about 60 miles north of Indianapolis IN I held no expectations of surviving any nuk attack. Dave Nagel WD9BDZ I'm afraid that 640khz _is_ the correct lower frequency. Somewhere, buried in some archive, the developmental documents for Conelrad may still exist and may explain the choice of frequencies. I think mostly it was to have a frequency that would be usable for any BC station. I also don't remember (if I ever knew) the power stations were supposed to use, I think quite low, perhaps a couple of hundred watts. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need Info on Morrow CM-1 Conelrad Rec. | Boatanchors | |||
CONELRAD | Shortwave |