Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another idea would be to use a second low power modulation transformer with a
separate amplifier feed off the same mike amp and with it's own level adjustment to only modulate the screen. You'd need two level adjustments in addition to the main mike gain control to set the proper levels for the high power plate modulator and the low power screen modulator. The screen modulator would only need to be a few watts, maybe single class A 6L6 or 6V6. I realize this is getting more complicated than just the choke in the screen circuit, but that's the beauty of home brew, trying things out just for the heck of it. I sometimes tend to be perfectionist, and I would then not like to start a project pursuing a compromise solution from the very beginning. So, I would like to have the screen modulated too, not just the plate. With regard to the separate audio amplifier for the screen, it should work but I am not sure whether some phase shift could occur between the two amplified audio signals (apart from the 180-degree phase ambiguity that can be easily resolved crossing the wires of one of the two modulation transformers). I have come to the conclusion that using a filter choke on the screen probably is the simplest way to go, and the safest for the final tube too. 73 Tony I0JX |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Antonio Vernucci wrote:
I sometimes tend to be perfectionist, and I would then not like to start a project pursuing a compromise solution from the very beginning. So, I would like to have the screen modulated too, not just the plate. I think that if you do this, you have higher audio distortion even though you have a slightly higher modulation level. With regard to the separate audio amplifier for the screen, it should work but I am not sure whether some phase shift could occur between the two amplified audio signals (apart from the 180-degree phase ambiguity that can be easily resolved crossing the wires of one of the two modulation transformers). It depends mostly on how well matched the modulation transformers are. Most of the group delay will be the result of the transformers. Better to use a transformer with two secondaries than two individual amps. I have come to the conclusion that using a filter choke on the screen probably is the simplest way to go, and the safest for the final tube too. Is the best possible fidelity important to you? Is having a tiny little bit more modulation important to you? I think in the manuals to the Bauer 707 broadcast transmitters there is a paragraph or two about the compromise. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need Plans for a Class 'A amp solid state or tube OK | Swap | |||
Need advice on tube glue | Equipment | |||
Need advice on tube glue | Equipment | |||
would like advice on idea for class E SSB Exciter | Homebrew | |||
would like advice on idea for class E SSB Exciter | Homebrew |