Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Nov 2011 18:14:27 -0000, Kulin Remailer
wrote: sctvguy1 wrote: What other radios do you think are better? I had a couple Nationals and my friends ran homebrews and Drakes and the occasional Collins. The National 303 especially was a favorite. Audio was warm like Bill Haley and the Comets on Fender tube (of course!) amps, and that heavy heavy tuning flywheel could almost spin across the whole band with one flick of the wrist. I believe it had 6 bandwidths from about 6K down to 250Hz. I haven't seen a better tube CW rig ever. SWL was great on it too. They seem to be loved by everyone who had one or ever used one. They were huge though, make room in the shack. What are the attributes that must be "part of better"? Does sctvguy1 want just a receiver or will a transceiver do? What modes does he really want to listen to, e.g., teletype, digital, cw, ssb, am, fm? What frequency range is desirable? Would he want VHF and UHF if he could get it? How about frequency setability? How about a computer interface to the receiver? Does it have to have knobs, or is a Software Defined Receiver ok? Is sensitiity more important than selectivity? Must it look "pretty"? Better is also a function of $. What kind of $ range is to be considered. Ed, N5EI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crystals for Hammarlund HQ-145X | Boatanchors | |||
Hammarlund HQ-180A | Boatanchors | |||
Differences between Hammarlund HQ-180 and -180A | Boatanchors | |||
Hammarlund HQ-180A NICE!!!!! | Boatanchors | |||
Hammarlund HQ-180A NICE!!!!! | Shortwave |