Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:31:05 -0800, Cadiscase wrote:
I am interested in AM broadcast reception and not familiar with Hallicrafters equipment. Can someone compare the Hallicrafters General Coverage Receivers from later 50's up. How does the Hallicrafters receivers compare with the Hammarlund [145/180] for clarity/selectivity/audio? Thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- I have a Hammarlund HQ-145XC, restored. It is an excellent receiver, dual conversion above 10MC, great for AM Broadcast Band DX. Its crystal filters give good selectivity and it is very sensitive. Mine has the optional clock. I know that it was a "general coverage" receiver, but I like it. If you have the money, then go for an HQ-180, very expensive if restored. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Acme of general coverage portable HF communications receivers? | Shortwave | |||
WTB: General Coverage RECEIVER | Swap | |||
Special General coverage RX FS | Equipment | |||
Special General coverage RX FS | Equipment | |||
FS: R S DX-394 General Coverage Receiver | Swap |