Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"gareth" wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... gareth wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message Perhaps you, as indeed do others seem, are trying to interpret a technique from the 1930s and 1940s in terms of the multi-pole Xtal filters that are the norm today? Well, yes. That is the point of this thread, isn't it? No, it isn't. I have a junk box going back 50 years from which I intend to make the sort of RX that I dreamed of as a teenager in the 1960s, on the basis that if I do not make use of all those museum bits and pieces, the executor of my will will be likely to bin the lot. I am inspired by the ham-bands only Eddystone EA12 and am making slow progress in a DIY effort to manufacture the gears for the dial drive and am now considering the manufacture of a Catacomb along the lines of the National NC100X. One technique from those pre-mechanical, and multi-pole or monolithic Xtal, filters was to use a _SINGLE_ crystal early on in the IF chain, and it is that single crystal together with its phasing control that interests me at the moment. Yes, and you would like to understand how that device works in terms of modern nyquist filter theory, correct? Harry Nyquist is far from modern, I have somewhere an essay of his from 1924, something along the lines of, "Certain topics in telegraph theory" What I was after was the standard way of setting up the phasing together with the BFO for eliminating an interfering carrier that was equally spaced from the BFO frequency on the other side. Once you have tuned the radio (VFO) to get the wanted signal at the centre of the crystal passband, you can set the BFO to taste and altering the phasing of the crystal will not alter the IF frequency of the wanted signal so won't alter the beat note. If the phasing shifts the crystal pass band significantly (which it probably won't) you might need to retune the radio (VFO) slightly and then the beat note would alter so you might have to adjust the BFO to taste again. But the BFO won't alter where the signal is in the passband, and the crystal phasing won't alter the beat note when it is adjusted. Only changing the VFO could do that. -- Percy Picacity |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
single rebate date , single recommended price , single recommended price | Dx | |||
Phasing Verticals | Antenna | |||
DRM signal and reception compared to analogue .... | Shortwave | |||
Radio Shack PRO-97 No reception of audio signal | Scanner | |||
Single frequency (channel) TRF for AM/BCB reception? Candidate Radios of Yesteryear? | Shortwave |