Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Patrick Turner's latest message replying to the thread I started on
building a high-performance AM tube tuner, he stated his skepticism that a pure TRF circuit will, in a practical sense, meet the specs I'm looking for (to meet the specs will require an impractical number of RF amplifier stages, such as six or more.) Within the design constraints he selected, I cannot disagree with his conclusion. However, one of the constraints he made, and that most make, is that tuning is to be done by an infinitely variable multigang air capacitor. I wonder if the same conclusion would be reached if we approach this from a single channel perspective? That is, what if we fix the frequency we want to receive (e.g., 830khz, or 1420khz), and then for each stage optimize the parallel RLC circuit (or use some other tuned circuit with the right resonance and bandwidth response -- crystals?) With the much greater design freedom this should allow, could we now possibly meet the specs with only two or three RF amps, for any frequency in the 500 to 1800khz range? For a simplified diagram of a two RF stage TRF receiver, see page 7 of: http://www.technology.niagarac.on.ca...531unit6rx.ppt Now, if this single channel approach indeed makes TRF more attractive, then the next step is obvious -- consider building the TRF AM tuner with selectable channels. Obviously, the downsides to this a the need for a switch, the complexity and cost of having lots of channels if we want to cover the whole BCB range (e.g., 120+, every 10khz in North America, and 9khz in Europe and elsewhere), and the issue of oscillation due to interference between the RF stages (shielding and proper layout design will likely be very critical.) I envision the tuned circuits for each channel being put on a mini-board which will plug into a slot, but then there may be other ways to handle the large number of tuned circuits necessary to cover the whole BCB (360+ of them -- this does sound quite expensive.) Thoughts? ***** Of course, the other alternative is to modernize a proven design of a super-het tube radio from yesteryear (the final audio amplifier will be stripped out, replaced with a line-out.) Which radio circuits would you nominate (with improvements), which provide excellent audio fidelity (probably with variable bandwidth control), very good sensitivity and selectivity, and other desirable specs? In addition, the circuit design should be "forgiving", so those who build it from kits (with pre-made PCB boards and proper guidance on layout and shielding) will likely be successful -- the parts, too, should be purchasable as NS from somewhere (NO SCROUNGING for old used parts as I've noted before). We probably need to make special arrangements for producing the various coils, since not everyone is going to want to wind their own coils. Jon Noring |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |