Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/04/2016 11:19 PM, Hank wrote:
In article , analogdial wrote: snipped for brevity That was about 25 years ago, so I've probably forgotten some things. As a radio, it was an interesting foray into studying 1940 state-of-the-art as well as quite impressive-looking. But compared to even early postwar designs, the set simply fell flat on its face at around 100 Mhz---not particularly sensitive, poor image rejection, and either too broad on AM or too narrow on FM. As I recall, that set ended up (with an early stereo converter) in the lobby of a non-com classical station as a lobby monitor. Hank Wow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , philo
writes On 02/04/2016 11:19 PM, Hank wrote: In article , analogdial wrote: snipped for brevity That was about 25 years ago, so I've probably forgotten some things. As a radio, it was an interesting foray into studying 1940 state-of-the-art as well as quite impressive-looking. But compared to even early postwar designs, the set simply fell flat on its face at around 100 Mhz---not particularly sensitive, poor image rejection, and either too broad on AM or too narrow on FM. As I recall, that set ended up (with an early stereo converter) in the lobby of a non-com classical station as a lobby monitor. Hank Wow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! "Minimum"? You'll never work any DX doing that! -- Ian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/07/2016 07:38 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
ow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! "Minimum"? You'll never work any DX doing that! I did not want to burn out my 807 OTOH: When ten meters is open, two watts (or less) can do the job |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/7/2016 10:42 AM, philo wrote:
On 02/07/2016 07:38 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: ow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! "Minimum"? You'll never work any DX doing that! I did not want to burn out my 807 OTOH: When ten meters is open, two watts (or less) can do the job Now that hurts, nostalgically! I started out with a pair of 1625's (807's with 12V filaments) in a military surplus xmtr I converted... That was in 1957. I wish I had it back now! Bob Wilson |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Bob Wilson
writes On 2/7/2016 10:42 AM, philo wrote: On 02/07/2016 07:38 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: ow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! "Minimum"? You'll never work any DX doing that! I did not want to burn out my 807 OTOH: When ten meters is open, two watts (or less) can do the job Now that hurts, nostalgically! I started out with a pair of 1625's (807's with 12V filaments) in a military surplus xmtr I converted... That was in 1957. I wish I had it back now! Bob Wilson TCS xx TX? I still have a TCS10. -- Ian |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/07/2016 01:44 PM, Bob Wilson wrote:
On 2/7/2016 10:42 AM, philo wrote: On 02/07/2016 07:38 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: ow, great account! I never had much test equipment so simply tuned to a weak signal and tweaked "by ear" as best as possible. As to working on transmitters, we always joked: Tune for minimum smoke! "Minimum"? You'll never work any DX doing that! I did not want to burn out my 807 OTOH: When ten meters is open, two watts (or less) can do the job Now that hurts, nostalgically! I started out with a pair of 1625's (807's with 12V filaments) in a military surplus xmtr I converted... That was in 1957. I wish I had it back now! Bob Wilson Here I am in my shack 50 years ago https://www.dropbox.com/s/5usk3tqswj...hack1.JPG?dl=0 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Schematic for BC-1031A Panoramic Adaptor | Boatanchors | |||
FA WATKINS-JOHNSON / CEI Panoramic Display | Swap | |||
Halli HG-1 Sig Gen. and SP-44 Panoramic | Boatanchors | |||
Panoramic Indicator IP-69A/ALA-2 | Boatanchors | |||
Panoramic Indicator IP-69A/ALA-2 | Boatanchors |