Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Scott Dorsey wrote: Though he invented the triode and recognized at once it's value, there was no where in the book where he gave a cogent explanation of how it actually worked. I think he had some basic idea of how amplification worked (with the grid attracting or repelling electrons passing by), but he clearly had absolutely no understanding of how the tube worked as an oscillator or how regeneration worked. And he certainly never got to the point of working out a transfer function as a characteristic curve. --scott I've always felt that deForest's history was another exercise in alchemical strangeness. It seems fairly clear that he did not have any real understanding of why or how his tubes worked, or what they might be capable of actually doing. Nor did he ever devise any practical circuitry for using them. A much larger contributor to circuitry was Armstrong, whose patents were overturned in favor of deForest later on---generally regarded as a travesty of justice. Development of the high-vacuum triode with a scientific understanding of what the control grid was doing to the electron stream---and development of a concomitant technology for series production of the devices was more an AT&T/Bell Labs effort. Also, the first major use of these devices was as telephony repeater amplifiers. Hank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|