LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old January 21st 05, 09:02 PM
Bill M
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug McLaren wrote:
In article ,
Bill M wrote:

| Wikipedia is wrong. Howard Armstrong was indeed working on the
| superheterodyne in 1918:
|
| Wilkipedia usually is wrong. Its compiled with 'user' input. You could
| submit that YOU were the inventor!

... and it'll probably get reverted shortly after.

Wikipedia is usually right. Yes, it's true that anybody can edit it
-- even you! But mistakes are made, and the people who write things
aren't always experts in the subject area. Still, Wikipedia is very
impressive.

Since you know the answer, why not go over and correct the article?

Since you want to make a big deal out of it, I have done such a thing on
certain topics in the past only to have them "recorrected" by those with
different facts and an agenda to promote.
You can do considerably better than this source for factual information.
It can't be assumed to be any more correct than a chat room.

-Bill
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 6 October 20th 03 09:52 PM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 10:06 PM
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits Reg Edwards Antenna 0 October 16th 03 11:54 PM
HF Receivers FS milradio Equipment 0 September 29th 03 09:44 AM
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? Don Pearce Homebrew 141 September 15th 03 05:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017