Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 08:33 AM
citizensband
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ged" wrote in message
...
In message ,
citizensband writes
All the garbage about how you should even be allowed to operate a CB,

unless
you are able to build your own equipment. Real Hams will never be able to
build a rig that even comes close to what's available off the shelf these
days. Most people can't even be bothered, have no interest or don't have

the
time to build rigs anymore. Boatanchors should be used for exactly that,
anchoring boats!

Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken
you all!

tox



Spoken like a true brain-dead CB-er.
--
Ged


Spoken like a brain-dead 'alleged' Ham, who thinks radio revolves around a
soldering iron...it doesn't anymore. Things are changing, look what has
happened to the Morse assessment! Even the RSGB have had the good sense to
move into the twenty first century!

HTH
tox



  #12   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 08:52 AM
Airy R Bean
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Even with a wheel mouse, you don't need to read the garbage.

However, a wheel mouse would seem to be the answer for those
who make the silly fuss - the arrogant bottom-posters - would it not?

Whinging Courier wrote in message
...
In uk.radio.amateur, warren weber said:
What's wrong with top posting? This way you don't need to read the

garbage.
Buy a wheel mouse.



  #13   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 09:07 AM
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Airy R Bean" SPAM@trap wrote in message
...
Even with a wheel mouse, you don't need to read the garbage.

However, a wheel mouse would seem to be the answer for those
who make the silly fuss - the arrogant bottom-posters - would it not?

http://tinyurl.com/h2yf



  #14   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 11:44 AM
citizensband
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Airy R Bean" SPAM@trap wrote in message
...
Even with a wheel mouse, you don't need to read the garbage.

However, a wheel mouse would seem to be the answer for those
who make the silly fuss - the arrogant bottom-posters - would it not?


The vast majority of Real Hams, stick to the protocol of bottom posting.
There are those, of course, who are incapable...such as yourself!

If you require some assistance on how to post correctly, do let me know.

HTH
tox


  #15   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 02:25 PM
R. Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default


.:\:/:.
+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+-------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | jgs (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\


  #16   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 02:47 PM
Carl R. Stevenson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the tip, Carl. Geeze, Analog Devices. I should have

remembered.
It has been quite a few years since I worked in Materials Engineering and
actually had a feel for the current state of the art. Heck, I was only

off
by a factor of 10 on that clock rate! 10 percent is one thing, but by a
decade! LOL. Be grateful I didn't suggest wiring a bunch of 12AU7s
together in flip flops. Hmmm ... where'd I put that core memory anyways?
BTW, those 400 MHz devices are 10 cents per dozen, right?


IIRC, they are not $1.95, but they are not hundreds of dollars, either ...
seems to me that the range is generally from about 5 - 50 bucks, depending
on device, quantity, etc.

I will check out the site, however; again, thanks for the tip.


ur wlcm es 73,
Carl - wk3c


  #17   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 03:28 PM
JJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why don't you go back to yelling
"aaaaaaaauuuuuuuudddddddddiiiiiiiooooooo" into your power mic on
channel 19.

citizensband wrote:
"Airy R Bean" SPAM@trap wrote in message
...

Even with a wheel mouse, you don't need to read the garbage.

However, a wheel mouse would seem to be the answer for those
who make the silly fuss - the arrogant bottom-posters - would it not?



The vast majority of Real Hams, stick to the protocol of bottom posting.
There are those, of course, who are incapable...such as yourself!

If you require some assistance on how to post correctly, do let me know.

HTH
tox



  #18   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 07:59 PM
zpk_12wpm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:44:44 +0100, "citizensband"
wrote:


Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken
you all!


oh ?

i thought it was about the person behind the mic (key / camera )
and that persons permission to self-train in the art of
communications.


never did i think that AMATEUR RADIO was about technology.

  #19   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 08:05 PM
zpk_12wpm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 16 Jul 2003 18:53:15 GMT, Leigh wrote:

.....and a true example of home-built radio was heard on 80m CW a week or
so ago - a Russian with homemade equipment that rasped CW more than broke
the carrier and was a wide signal.

Sort of knocks the 'build your own' case for Gareth into a cocked hat - not
easy to work or even work out who or where he was.


thats the classic eastern european sound of homemade gear.

that and the tone that starts high and goes low as the dah dah dah
is sent.

dont worry, you get used to it.
  #20   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 08:32 PM
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Hampton wrote:
Thanks for the tip, Carl. Geeze, Analog Devices. I should have remembered.
It has been quite a few years since I worked in Materials Engineering and
actually had a feel for the current state of the art. Heck, I was only off
by a factor of 10 on that clock rate! 10 percent is one thing, but by a
decade! LOL. Be grateful I didn't suggest wiring a bunch of 12AU7s
together in flip flops. Hmmm ... where'd I put that core memory anyways?
BTW, those 400 MHz devices are 10 cents per dozen, right?


All of the AD synthesizers I have seen have a microprocessor interface,
where they basically memory-map into a processor. I'd rather have something
I can directly address.

I could probably pull out a 68HC11 to control the thing if I absolutely had
to, but I'd rather have something I can just latch a BCD input into.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 10:44 AM
HAMS in or near EVERGREEN, COLORADO SecondHandMarklin.com Antenna 0 January 6th 04 03:19 AM
Reflection Delay is it real??? Peter O. Brackett Antenna 7 September 20th 03 11:55 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017