Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 12th 03, 02:31 PM
ckh
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 12 Oct 3903 00:01:12,
] wrote:

I just bought a TR-4 for my brother's birthday, and his wife asked me
why it needs a separate power supply. I explained that mobile and
fixed stations need different supplies, and so they're sold
separately.

However, her question has piqued my curiousity, and I'll ask the rrab
readers to answer one of mine: why were the transmitters of "twin"
receiver/transmitter combos, such as the R-4/T-4 pair, designed with
separate supplies?

If there are any historians reading this, I'd appreciate your
insights into why the design went in this direction.

TIA.

73, Bill W1AC

(My email address is in the headers)


Some were, some weren't. 32S3, SB-400, HT-44, T-599.

de ah6gi/4


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 334 November 9th 04 05:45 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017