Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 02:01 AM
Dave Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, that is the one... not even in the same league as the Drake rigs,
but an unusual rig anyway.
....Dave
"George McCouch" wrote in message
...
In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD







Dan/W4NTI w4nti@get wrote:

"Dave Edwards" wrote in message
...
Don't need a model number, I think there was only one...
Anyone have one of these receivers around that they are no longer
interested in?
I always wanted to fool with one, so...just thought I would check

here.
Thanks....Dave



That brings back some memories. The model number was CM-1 if I recall.

I
had one back around 63. I had forgotten I even had one of those. Im in

the
process of 'collecting' my old stations.. hi.

Dan/W4NTI



--
Remove the "1" in the address to reply via email



  #2   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 02:10 AM
Dale Parfitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default



George McCouch wrote:

In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD


They are no 2B- but still a nice RX- They were about 2/3 the cost of a 2B ($175
for the CM-1). 5 6AW8A's- triode/pentode. It is really an 80M RX with xtal
controlled converters for the other bands. In a day when even the nicest
Hallicrafters or Hammarlunds sported 50 Kc calibration marks- the CM-1 had marks
every 10 KHz on all bands- and of course, the stability of an 80M RX on 10M. They
came in 2 styles all grey front panel with horizontal black pin striping 2/3 the
way up and a black freq window bezel and a panel that was black on the upper 1/3
with a grey freq bezel. The former, in my opinion is the snazzier looking RX.
Even rarer than the CM-1 is the matching CMS-1 speaker. The grill cloth is black
with a gold painted "thread" pattern making loops through out. I have recreated
the cloth using a special gold acrylic paint- awfully close to the original cloth.

BTW, Collins S-Line grey is a near perfect match for the Mosley colors.
I have a nice difital pix of my CM-1 and CMS-1 if anyone would like to see it.
Dale W4OP

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 11:45 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale Parfitt" wrote in message
...


George McCouch wrote:

In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD


They are no 2B- but still a nice RX- They were about 2/3 the cost of a 2B

($175
for the CM-1). 5 6AW8A's- triode/pentode. It is really an 80M RX with xtal
controlled converters for the other bands. In a day when even the nicest
Hallicrafters or Hammarlunds sported 50 Kc calibration marks- the CM-1 had

marks
every 10 KHz on all bands- and of course, the stability of an 80M RX on

10M. They
came in 2 styles all grey front panel with horizontal black pin striping

2/3 the
way up and a black freq window bezel and a panel that was black on the

upper 1/3
with a grey freq bezel. The former, in my opinion is the snazzier looking

RX.
Even rarer than the CM-1 is the matching CMS-1 speaker. The grill cloth is

black
with a gold painted "thread" pattern making loops through out. I have

recreated
the cloth using a special gold acrylic paint- awfully close to the

original cloth.

BTW, Collins S-Line grey is a near perfect match for the Mosley colors.
I have a nice difital pix of my CM-1 and CMS-1 if anyone would like to see

it.
Dale W4OP


Whats the link? Would love to see them.

Dan/W4NTI


  #4   Report Post  
Old October 25th 03, 04:33 AM
Dale Parfitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Whats the link? Would love to see them.

Dan/W4NTI

Not posted Dan- I can send you a JPEG.


Dale W4OP


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 25th 03, 04:33 AM
Dale Parfitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Whats the link? Would love to see them.

Dan/W4NTI

Not posted Dan- I can send you a JPEG.


Dale W4OP




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 11:45 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale Parfitt" wrote in message
...


George McCouch wrote:

In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD


They are no 2B- but still a nice RX- They were about 2/3 the cost of a 2B

($175
for the CM-1). 5 6AW8A's- triode/pentode. It is really an 80M RX with xtal
controlled converters for the other bands. In a day when even the nicest
Hallicrafters or Hammarlunds sported 50 Kc calibration marks- the CM-1 had

marks
every 10 KHz on all bands- and of course, the stability of an 80M RX on

10M. They
came in 2 styles all grey front panel with horizontal black pin striping

2/3 the
way up and a black freq window bezel and a panel that was black on the

upper 1/3
with a grey freq bezel. The former, in my opinion is the snazzier looking

RX.
Even rarer than the CM-1 is the matching CMS-1 speaker. The grill cloth is

black
with a gold painted "thread" pattern making loops through out. I have

recreated
the cloth using a special gold acrylic paint- awfully close to the

original cloth.

BTW, Collins S-Line grey is a near perfect match for the Mosley colors.
I have a nice difital pix of my CM-1 and CMS-1 if anyone would like to see

it.
Dale W4OP


Whats the link? Would love to see them.

Dan/W4NTI


  #7   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 01:54 AM
Bill Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gateway Electroncs in St. Louis unloaded the remains of the line. I
still have a AC VTVM build in one of the speaker cases. BILL

  #8   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 01:54 AM
Bill Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gateway Electroncs in St. Louis unloaded the remains of the line. I
still have a AC VTVM build in one of the speaker cases. BILL

  #9   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 02:10 AM
Dale Parfitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default



George McCouch wrote:

In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD


They are no 2B- but still a nice RX- They were about 2/3 the cost of a 2B ($175
for the CM-1). 5 6AW8A's- triode/pentode. It is really an 80M RX with xtal
controlled converters for the other bands. In a day when even the nicest
Hallicrafters or Hammarlunds sported 50 Kc calibration marks- the CM-1 had marks
every 10 KHz on all bands- and of course, the stability of an 80M RX on 10M. They
came in 2 styles all grey front panel with horizontal black pin striping 2/3 the
way up and a black freq window bezel and a panel that was black on the upper 1/3
with a grey freq bezel. The former, in my opinion is the snazzier looking RX.
Even rarer than the CM-1 is the matching CMS-1 speaker. The grill cloth is black
with a gold painted "thread" pattern making loops through out. I have recreated
the cloth using a special gold acrylic paint- awfully close to the original cloth.

BTW, Collins S-Line grey is a near perfect match for the Mosley colors.
I have a nice difital pix of my CM-1 and CMS-1 if anyone would like to see it.
Dale W4OP

  #10   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 01:24 AM
George McCouch
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,

Is the CM1 the reciever that used the same tube for all receiver
stages? I think it was supposed to compete with the Drake 2A and 2B in
the early 60s. I have seen them but never used one. How did they work?
Did they approach the performance of the 2B?

73
George
K3UD







Dan/W4NTI w4nti@get wrote:

"Dave Edwards" wrote in message
...
Don't need a model number, I think there was only one...
Anyone have one of these receivers around that they are no longer
interested in?
I always wanted to fool with one, so...just thought I would check here.
Thanks....Dave



That brings back some memories. The model number was CM-1 if I recall. I
had one back around 63. I had forgotten I even had one of those. Im in the
process of 'collecting' my old stations.. hi.

Dan/W4NTI



--
Remove the "1" in the address to reply via email


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
surveillance receiver aerial zentace Antenna 3 November 28th 04 07:39 PM
FS: National NC-183 Receiver K2DP Boatanchors 0 October 6th 03 05:27 AM
FS: National NC-183 Receiver K2DP Boatanchors 0 October 6th 03 05:27 AM
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit Larry Johnson Boatanchors 0 September 28th 03 08:31 PM
fs rca cr91a communications receiver Chris Fuller Boatanchors 0 August 22nd 03 08:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017