Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Frank wrote: I think we can both say with confidence that Ducati got the electrolyte formulation right, way back two or three decades ago. I didn't measure any significant change in capacitance or ESR (except ESR went up on a couple on the last test). If they had a +/- 20% tolerance, they were in spec at the start and stayed in spec at every step of the test. But I never noticed a big change when I've checked electrolytics before. I didn't find any big changes either, measuring high-voltage electrolytics from as far back as 1947. Looking at your data, within the limits of experimental error I don't see any changes at all. That pretty much kills the myth about capacitors reforming to a new working voltage and changing the oxide-layer thickness. However I'm sure we haven't seen the last of it. I believe there's still a website with quotes from Deeley's book on electrolytic capacitors. What it doesn't say is that this book was published in 1939. 73, Alan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Weather caps | Antenna | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Trap end caps | Antenna | |||
Resistance Checking | Boatanchors |