Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok Alan,
What do you imagine is happening when you reform an old electrolytic? Let's go back once again to an old industry reference on electrolytics. The 1968, "Reference Data For Radio Engineers", published by ITT. The articles in it are authored by experts from academia, and industry. First, a useful definition that provides a clue: ----------------------------------------------- Forming Voltage (electrolytics): The voltage at which the anodic oxide has been formed. The thickness of the oxide layer is proportional to this voltage. Next a description: ------------------ Aluminum Electrolytics This is the most widly know electrolytic capacitor and is used extensively in radio and television equipment. It has a space factor about 6 times better than the equivalent paper capacitor. Types of improved reliability are now available using high-purity (better than 99.99%) aluminum. Conventional aluminum electrolytic capacitors which have gone 6 months or more without voltage applied may need to be reformed. Rated voltage is applied from a dc source with an internal resistance of 1500 ohms for capacitors with a rated voltage exceeding 100 volts, or 150 ohms for capacitors with a rated voltage equal to or less than 100 volts. The voltage must be applied for one hour after reaching rated value with a tolerance of +/- 3 percent. The capacitor is then discharged through a resistor of 1 ohm/volt. [by rated value, they mean, of course, rated voltage - cfh] Now a description of the construction of electrolytic capacitors: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS Electrolytic capacitors (Fig 11) employ for at least one of their electrodes a "valve metal". This metal when operated in an electrolytic cell as the [My attempt at an ascii figure 11 - cfh] - + O-----|C|. . . . . . . .|O|A|-----O |A| . . . . . .|X|N| |T| Conducting .. .. .. .|I|O| |H| Electrolyte . . .|D|D| |O|. . . . . . . .|E|E| |D| . . . . . .| | | |E|. . . . . . .| | | O---------SERIES-R---------+---)|-------+---O | | +-Leakage R--+ Note the series R is caused by the leads and electrolyte, etc. the Leakage R is caused by the oxide layer. FIG. 11 anode, forms a layer of dielectric oxide. The most commonly used metals are aluminum or tantalum. The valve metal behavior of these metals was know about 1850. Tantalum electrolytic capacitors were introduced in the 1950's because of the need for highly reliable miniature capacitors in transistor circuits over a wide temperature range. These capacitors were made possible by improved refining and powder metallurgy techniques. The term "electrolytic capacitor" is applied to any capacitor in which the dielectric layer is formed by an electrolytic method. The capacitor does not necessarily contain an electrolyte. The oxide layer is formed by placing the metal in a bath containing a suitable forming electrolyte, and applying voltage between the metal as anode and another electrode as cathode. The oxide grows at a rate determined by the current flowing, but this rate of grwoth decreases until the oxide has reached a limiting thickness determined by the voltage. For most practical purposes it may be assumed that the thickness of the oxide is proportional to the forming voltage. [ a figure showing some characteristics of oxides...] The structure of these oxide layers plays an important part in determining their performance. Ideally they are amorphous but aluminum tends to form two distinct layers, the outer one being porous. Tantalum normally forms an amorphous oxide which, under conditions of a high field strength of the oxide layer, may become crystaline. Depending on the forming electrolyte and the surface condition of the metal, there is an upper limit of voltage beyond which the oxide breaks down. The working voltage is between 25 and 90 percent (according to type) of the forming voltage at which stable operation of the oxide layer can be obtained. To produce a capacitor it is necessary to make contact to the oxide layer on the anode, and there are two distinct methods of doing this. The first is to use a working electrolyte that has sufficient conductivity over the temperature range to give a good power factor. There are many considerations in choosing the working electrolyte, and the choice is usually a compromise between high and low temperature performance. The working electrolyte also provides a rehealing feature in that any faults in the oxide layer will be repaired by further anodization. In aluminum electrolytic capacitors the working electrolyte must be restricted to those materials in which aluminum and its oxide are inert. Corrosion can be minimized by using the highest possible purity of aluminum. This also reduces the tendency of the oxide layer to dissolve in the electrolyte, giving a better shelf life. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notice three things about the above dissertation: 1) The oxide layer is formed before assembly, and its thickness determines both the working voltage, and the capacitance. 2) The working electrolyte makes contact to the oxide layer, and also performs a rehealing feature that repairs any faults in the oxide layer by reanodizing the layer. 3) The working electrolyte will dissolve the oxide layer over time if no voltage is applied to the capacitor. This is the cause of shelf life. I believe this discription. I have personally witnessed it many many times with old aluminum electrolytics (with wet working electrolytes). You can continue to think it a myth, but it isn't. -Chuck Harris, WA3UQV Alan Douglas wrote: Hi, Frank wrote: I think we can both say with confidence that Ducati got the electrolyte formulation right, way back two or three decades ago. I didn't measure any significant change in capacitance or ESR (except ESR went up on a couple on the last test). If they had a +/- 20% tolerance, they were in spec at the start and stayed in spec at every step of the test. But I never noticed a big change when I've checked electrolytics before. I didn't find any big changes either, measuring high-voltage electrolytics from as far back as 1947. Looking at your data, within the limits of experimental error I don't see any changes at all. That pretty much kills the myth about capacitors reforming to a new working voltage and changing the oxide-layer thickness. However I'm sure we haven't seen the last of it. I believe there's still a website with quotes from Deeley's book on electrolytic capacitors. What it doesn't say is that this book was published in 1939. 73, Alan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Weather caps | Antenna | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Trap end caps | Antenna | |||
Resistance Checking | Boatanchors |