Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Alan,
Because of the physical construction of an electrolytic cap, it MUST change capacitance if the oxide grows thinner in storage, or thickens thru reforming... But, I too notice that sometimes the change is large, and othertimes it is not. I suspect that what is happening is the oxide layer thins out only in spots (probably around impurities) in some caps. These spots are large enough to readily affect the leakage current, but are small with respect to the total surface area of the plates. Because they are a small percentage of the total surface area, they only minimally affect the total capacitance. -Chuck Harris Alan Douglas wrote: Hi, I would guess that "re-forming" an electrolytic is actually reforming only the defects in the oxide film. At least that would explain why it works, but doesn't affect overall capacitance. I've only found one capacitor that decreased its value significantly after reforming, an Aerovox 8µF 450V unit dated 1946. That started out at 17µF and decreased to 12.1µF after 12 hours, but still showed 0.46mA leakage. All others, including a pair of NOS *wet* Sprague 16µF 450V caps, showed little if any change. The Spragues by the way ended up at 4mA leakage, so I don't think I'll be using them in a radio. Cheers, Alan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Weather caps | Antenna | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Trap end caps | Antenna | |||
Resistance Checking | Boatanchors |