Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "geojunkie" wrote in message om... I am having a lot of trouble understanding the proper method to align the crystal filter section (off the output of 3rd IF transformer)in an SX-71. The manual suggests "rocking" the signal generator around the IF frequency (455khz) while turning the IF transformer slug and monitoring the output level to find a null between two peaks. You are supposed to set the slug to the null. The output tone is to be created using the BFO set for 1kz at the IF frequency. I don't understand what is creating the peaks and null... the rocking of the generator or the adjusting of the slug? There is a huge null created just by rocking the generator as the beat frequency drops from 1khz to zero and then ramps up again on the other side. I can't imagine this is the null, but it overpowers anything else I am seeing. Then how do I set the slug at the null point, when its impact is hardly discernible? This is very difficult to do with a standard service type signal generator. You need one that tunes very slowly around 455kc. The null you are looking for is very sharp. I did this a couple of years ago on my SX-62. I found the instructions in the manual confusing, but basically you are looking for the deepest difference between the bottom of the null and the top of the peak. "Rocking" means tuning the signal generator up and down a few tens of cycles or so to feel out the null and peak. The adjustments will change the frequencies of the notch and peak slightly. So you are manually sweeping back and forth, back and forth, and so on. You don't really need the BFO, if you monitor the voltage of the AVC line. I could be out to lunch, but why not use a sweep generator and scope to actually look at the wave shape being passed through that section of the IF. That would work if you can sweep slow enough. The crystal rings too much with a 60 cps sweep speed. Or, why not just adjust the slug to provide the highest peak at the crystal frequency (which is actually 456.7khz) as is recommended for the rest of the IF section? That's probably fine. Getting the crystal filter just right is more important in the narrowest modes, like CW. It also helps with SSB, it's not so important with AM. The null can be helpful with hets, but it takes a bit of practice to use. It's too bad the single crystal filter doesn't help much with adjecent channel selectivity, which what is really needed for good AM DXing. Also, the peak/null of the filter is so narrow that the normal receiver drift has to be constantly compensated for. BTW, this is my first communications receiver. Up to now I have been restoring test equipment, broadcast radios, and a couple of TVs (all tube gear). Any and all advice would be much appreciated. So far in my aligning the SX-71, I seem to have increased the ringing caused when the filter is used to the point it seems hardly useful. Well, the ringing at least that tells you your crystal is still good. Doesn't this crystal filter have a switch between sharp, narrow and broad? The ringing should go down as the filter goes to it's broader positions. I have a couple of single crystal filter radios. They will both demodulate CW and SSB with the ringing crystal filter in the sharp position. It's not a useful feature, at least for SSB. Tuning is hypercritical, and normal drift will detune it within seconds. I don't know if that was caused by misadjusting this particular slug, or because I aligned the rest of the IF to exactly to the crystal instead of just 455khz, which is what they said to do. I have recapped the unit (just the papers), replaced a few far out of range resistors and changed a couple of weak tubes. Dan There's good reasons the manufacturers gave up on the single crystal filter decades ago. The ceramic and multipole crystal filter are easier to use, and have much better adjacent channel selectivity. But they can be fun to use, once you get the knack. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|