Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 8th 04, 05:04 PM
Mike Knudsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net, "PJ"
writes:

Yes, I listened to that for a time too. It was cool. Unfortunately, after
the W1AW op went to supper, the conversation degenerated into a bunch of
guys trying to run everyone else off 75 meters. It was funny for a while,
until it just became pathetic.


I didn't hear it that way. The guys who filled in between the W1AW break were
taking breakers and "check-ins". A lot of them knew each other, of course.
There were a lot of carriers from guys tuning up, and breakers tromping on each
other, naturally. Some of the double and triple heterodynes were like a
singing commercial for SSB :-)

But I didn't take anything as rude or exclusive. There are of course plenty of
professional LIDs on 75 who need less testosterone and more medication, but
they are no way confined to AM. In fact, I feel a lot "safer" running AM on 75
than SSB.
73, Mike K.
Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 12:17 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Knudsen" wrote in message
...
In article . net, "PJ"
writes:

Yes, I listened to that for a time too. It was cool. Unfortunately,

after
the W1AW op went to supper, the conversation degenerated into a bunch of
guys trying to run everyone else off 75 meters. It was funny for a

while,
until it just became pathetic.


I didn't hear it that way. The guys who filled in between the W1AW break

were
taking breakers and "check-ins". A lot of them knew each other, of

course.
There were a lot of carriers from guys tuning up, and breakers tromping on

each
other, naturally. Some of the double and triple heterodynes were like a
singing commercial for SSB :-)

But I didn't take anything as rude or exclusive. There are of course

plenty of
professional LIDs on 75 who need less testosterone and more medication,

but
they are no way confined to AM. In fact, I feel a lot "safer" running AM

on 75
than SSB.
73, Mike K.
Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.


You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had
wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single
night until wee hours of the AM.

Dan/W4NTI


  #3   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 02:45 AM
Dbowey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

w4nti posted:
You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had
wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single
night until wee hours of the AM.

I was there, sometimes with, and sometimes without, carrier. I enjoyed 75
meters, and didn't mind the QRM - It was just part of the ham game. It was a
good band to connect up with friends and acquaintances. AM is much more
sociable than SSB just because you can recognize a voice without careful
tuning.

It was rare back then to encounter a foul-mouth.

Don

  #4   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 04:44 AM
Mike Knudsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had
wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single
night until wee hours of the AM.


I do remember that, vaguely. Isn't that the era when every good receiver had a
slot filter, notch filter, or Q-Multiplier reject filter? These lasted thru
the transition era from AM to SSB, when the sidewinders really had to suffer
those hets!
73, Mike K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 11th 04, 01:28 AM
Nancy Young
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AM was and is cool. Unfortunately, SSB is much better for everyone. I
remember the AM days well, too, and I had a lot of fun with it. And yes, it
was a mess back then.

I think that the bands are much easier to navigate now, without the AM, but
it is still good to hear the few who choose to run it from time to time.

I've been really impressed, actually with my new TS 2000 and it's DSP
function -- not for rejection of interference, actually, but for its ability
to open up to about 3 KHZ for SSB and really appreciate the fidelity that is
hidden in some of the better SSB station's signals. Of course, most are
limited by their transmission filter characteristics, but it actually sounds
pretty good.

Phil


"Mike Knudsen" wrote in message
...
In article . net,

"Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had
wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every

single
night until wee hours of the AM.


I do remember that, vaguely. Isn't that the era when every good receiver

had a
slot filter, notch filter, or Q-Multiplier reject filter? These lasted

thru
the transition era from AM to SSB, when the sidewinders really had to

suffer
those hets!
73, Mike K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017