Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "PJ"
writes: Yes, I listened to that for a time too. It was cool. Unfortunately, after the W1AW op went to supper, the conversation degenerated into a bunch of guys trying to run everyone else off 75 meters. It was funny for a while, until it just became pathetic. I didn't hear it that way. The guys who filled in between the W1AW break were taking breakers and "check-ins". A lot of them knew each other, of course. There were a lot of carriers from guys tuning up, and breakers tromping on each other, naturally. Some of the double and triple heterodynes were like a singing commercial for SSB :-) But I didn't take anything as rude or exclusive. There are of course plenty of professional LIDs on 75 who need less testosterone and more medication, but they are no way confined to AM. In fact, I feel a lot "safer" running AM on 75 than SSB. 73, Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Knudsen" wrote in message ... In article . net, "PJ" writes: Yes, I listened to that for a time too. It was cool. Unfortunately, after the W1AW op went to supper, the conversation degenerated into a bunch of guys trying to run everyone else off 75 meters. It was funny for a while, until it just became pathetic. I didn't hear it that way. The guys who filled in between the W1AW break were taking breakers and "check-ins". A lot of them knew each other, of course. There were a lot of carriers from guys tuning up, and breakers tromping on each other, naturally. Some of the double and triple heterodynes were like a singing commercial for SSB :-) But I didn't take anything as rude or exclusive. There are of course plenty of professional LIDs on 75 who need less testosterone and more medication, but they are no way confined to AM. In fact, I feel a lot "safer" running AM on 75 than SSB. 73, Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single night until wee hours of the AM. Dan/W4NTI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
w4nti posted:
You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single night until wee hours of the AM. I was there, sometimes with, and sometimes without, carrier. I enjoyed 75 meters, and didn't mind the QRM - It was just part of the ham game. It was a good band to connect up with friends and acquaintances. AM is much more sociable than SSB just because you can recognize a voice without careful tuning. It was rare back then to encounter a foul-mouth. Don |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single night until wee hours of the AM. I do remember that, vaguely. Isn't that the era when every good receiver had a slot filter, notch filter, or Q-Multiplier reject filter? These lasted thru the transition era from AM to SSB, when the sidewinders really had to suffer those hets! 73, Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AM was and is cool. Unfortunately, SSB is much better for everyone. I
remember the AM days well, too, and I had a lot of fun with it. And yes, it was a mess back then. I think that the bands are much easier to navigate now, without the AM, but it is still good to hear the few who choose to run it from time to time. I've been really impressed, actually with my new TS 2000 and it's DSP function -- not for rejection of interference, actually, but for its ability to open up to about 3 KHZ for SSB and really appreciate the fidelity that is hidden in some of the better SSB station's signals. Of course, most are limited by their transmission filter characteristics, but it actually sounds pretty good. Phil "Mike Knudsen" wrote in message ... In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: You should have heard 75 in the late 50, early 60s. That is when you had wall to wall carriers and assorted hetrodynes from 3.8 to 4.0 every single night until wee hours of the AM. I do remember that, vaguely. Isn't that the era when every good receiver had a slot filter, notch filter, or Q-Multiplier reject filter? These lasted thru the transition era from AM to SSB, when the sidewinders really had to suffer those hets! 73, Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|