Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 07:45 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Biz WDØHCO" wrote in message
...


Shipboard receiver installations varied widely depending on how prosperous
the shipping company was. Some were every bit as equal to any land
installation while others were little more than (as an old timer once told
me) a Marconi turd with a cat whisker stuck in it.

About training - well first - many Merchant R OPs's joined the Armed

Forces
right off - so that left those with age, foot or vision problems or

retired
OPs to man the radio shacks. Most of these men were trained by RCA

Worldwide
Wireless or Marconi. ALL had many years of practical experience on the

high
seas.

Navy on the other hand had a problem - ships were being built at a

fantastic
rate and only recently trained "8 Week Wonders" Radio Ops who never had

been
out to sea to man the shacks. The Navy had to sprinkle experienced Ham

Radio
and Merchant Marines as lead OPs throughout the fleet to keep things

moving
till the green horns got up to speed. As it was, there were a number of
comical foulups related to mis-communications.


Yeah, that makes sense.

Yep - Ive heard of stories of passing Convoy ships firing their deck guns

on
German Life boats - a big Geneva treaty NO NO. Also heard about s broken
down U-boat with the whole crew lined up outside on top waving white

flags.
Passing ship turned toward it, increased speed and rammed it and kept on
going. I think it was safe to say there was some serious hatred there.

I'll also mention code breaking in the anti-sub war.


hmmm ok - where should I start?

We are of course talking about the British breaking the codes being sent

and
received by German Enigma Code machines. Brits are proud of saying their
collection of eccentric mathematics wizards and puzzle solving misfits

broke
the code in something like 3 or 4 weeks.

What is glossed over is that the front line German Radio OPs were somewhat
lazy and seldom if ever changed the code wheels on the machine. The German
high command believed their code machine unbreakable but even so still
changed the code wheels on a weekly basis for high level comms.

They believed even if front line comms could be broken - they were of

little
strategic value to the enemy. Of course we now know, if you broken low

level
comms you can follow the messages up the chain and stand a good chance of
breaking that code if you know what is in the message being sent.

The Bits did this and now had access to most of the Germany Armed Forces
comms.

Now what to do with it?

What now follows is my own speculation - much of the story still remains
classified to this day. I can only go back and look at the historical

facts
and come up with some fairly logical deductions -

..in other words - I'm guessing...

(1) Clearly - Churchill could have told the Americans early on - He choose
not to do this until much later.



I've read Churchill wanted as much American involvement as possible,
particularly after Dunkirk. He was dealing with Roosevelt through Sir
William Stephenson. Churchill and Stephenson decided to risk sharing their
best intelligence information in order to show Roosevelt that the Great
Britian still had a chance. Without the shared intelligence, the deal for
the old destroyers and other arms almost certainly would never have gone
through.



(2) Britan could not directly go after subs and ships. To do so would tip
the Germans that the code was broken and force them to change their wheels
on a daily (or hourly) basis. Remember it took 3 weeks (and I suspect much
more) to break each code. So even though they had a stolen Enigma and the
tools to break the code - it would have been of little use if the code was
changed daily.


You're right. The codes couldn't have been timely enough to locate the
subs. Radio location could, but the destroyers and bombers would almost be
too late to find anything. The value was, I suppose, more stratigic than
tactical (as they say on cable TV)


(3) America at the time was isolationist. The Brits saw what a single Jap
Attack at Pearl Harbor had done. Almost overnight, America was at war -

with
Japan. Most Americans wanted to fight the Japs only - they had no beef

with
Germany.

(4) The Lend-Lease convoys were US Merchant Ships carrying U.S. War

Material
protected by the U.S. Navy Ships manned by US Sailors. The Brits knew the
exact locations of German subs out to sink the convoys but kept quiet. The
loss of some shipping and American lives would keep the United States
focused and involved with the war in Europe.


The story is that Roosevelt knew. I can't be sure the story is absolutely
true, but it seems credible. I doubt the exact location of the German subs
could have been determined in a useful way until aircraft had good radar.


(5) As you can imagine - the Americans were livid when finally told. Not

so
much for the loss of American life but for the fact they were so well

played
by Churchill.



I don't think Roosevelt was played by Churchill. They were pretty much in
agreement about defending England, and defeating Hitler.


(6) This and the massive defeat ("Heroic Retreat" as the Brits tell it) at
Dunkirk were probably the two major factors in selecting an American as
Supreme Allied Commander.


It would have also have been tougher to maintin a "Hitler First" program in
the US, if the Allies were headed up by a Brit.



Of course all this is just idle speculation...


That's what keeps it fun!


I think the code breaking used in the anti-sub effort came much later when
it was certain America would join the British War effort.


It's my understanding that the code breaking was most useful in the air war
of the Battle of Britain.


But we may never really know. -B


Yeah, I like spy stories as much as anyone, but I can't often tell the BS
from the truth or even what is being left out.

Frank Dresser



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Heath DX-60 Transmitter: GR-78 Receiver Bruce Stock Boatanchors 0 March 17th 04 06:21 PM
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit Larry Johnson Boatanchors 0 September 28th 03 08:31 PM
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit Larry Johnson Boatanchors 0 September 28th 03 08:31 PM
fs rca cr91a communications receiver Chris Fuller Boatanchors 0 August 22nd 03 08:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017