Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found an EH Scott SLR-12-B (Navy? 'morale') receiver
(550kc-16Mc) for sale. I would like to know what ($) to offer for it presuming good working condition. I have not been able to find much information about this set on the internet. If you know of any EH Scott BA resources I would appreciate if you share them with me. TIA! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Biz WDØHCO wrote:
E.H. Scott was a native New Zealander who came to the US and founded Scott Transformer Co in 1924. The name of the company was changed to Scott Radio Labs when it was re-located to Chicago in 1931. Scott sold most of his interest in the company when he was demoted from president to sales manager 1944 and resigned in 1945. He died in his retirement home in Victoria B.C. Canada. Some (quoted) facts well stated, others tend to carry a bias. The E.H. Scott Morale Receiver is interesting in that it was the only receiver made during WW2 where radiation from the local oscillators were heavily suppressed. Absolute BS. Now the Scott story takes a twist. Scott mfgd a whole slew of non-mil radios in that era. So did many others. I've got a cheapo PECO radio in the closet that was sold in PXs in places like Tarawa. No 'special' filtering or shielding of the LO. Up to that point, the Germans learned to DF a convoy by tuning into the signals given off by local oscillators. Some German subs could detect these signals from as far as 100 miles at night. Needless to say, Scott sold many receivers to the U.S. Navy. Hmmm, ok. Still they remain fairly rare on the market. I'd offer $60 to $80 and see if the seller bites. You will probably have to changed the electrolytic caps and a few tubes. I'd say they are fairly common, at least on ebay, and more like 150-200... and three dollars worth of hastily ho-rigged-in replacement caps would only be a negative to the sets value as a collectible. Of course I could be wrong also... -Bill WX4A - Biz WD0HCO |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Some (quoted) facts well stated, others tend to carry a bias. The E.H. Scott Morale Receiver is interesting in that it was the only receiver made during WW2 where radiation from the local oscillators were heavily suppressed. Absolute BS. Now the Scott story takes a twist. Scott mfgd a whole slew of non-mil radios in that era. So did many others. I've got a cheapo PECO radio in the closet that was sold in PXs in places like Tarawa. No 'special' filtering or shielding of the LO. YES BUBBA... but we are talking about a Military SLR-12-B and the statement above is very true. As for the "whole slew of" bit - civilian radio production (along with a whole lot of other things) was severely reduced during the war years. Up to that point, the Germans learned to DF a convoy by tuning into the signals given off by local oscillators. Some German subs could detect these signals from as far as 100 miles at night. Needless to say, Scott sold many receivers to the U.S. Navy. Hmmm, ok. Still they remain fairly rare on the market. I'd offer $60 to $80 and see if the seller bites. You will probably have to changed the electrolytic caps and a few tubes. I'd say they are fairly common, at least on ebay, and more like 150-200... and three dollars worth of hastily ho-rigged-in replacement caps would only be a negative to the sets value as a collectible. eBay is a great place to sell - bad place to buy. The gentleman was buying the radio. I wouldn't pay more than $80 for it myself. But then again, I wouldn't pay $8,000 for an SX-88, but that just me. I'm not a blonde, bloated burned out musician. ;^) Seen No SLR-12-B's on eBay for the past year. Right about electrolytics - yep they cost bucks - which is why Rich should pay even LESS for that old Scott! Of course I could be wrong also... CLARO QUE SI! -Bill WX4A |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Biz WDØHCO" wrote in message ... [snip] .. The E.H. Scott Morale Receiver is interesting in that it was the only receiver made during WW2 where radiation from the local oscillators were heavily suppressed. Lots of receivers had dual pentode RF stages to minimize oscillator leakage. Up to that point, the Germans learned to DF a convoy by tuning into the signals given off by local oscillators. Some German subs could detect these signals from as far as 100 miles at night. I'd think that regenerative recievers operated by careless operators were the real risk of giving a ship's location away. Detecting a normal superhet at 100 miles seems iffy to me. [snip] Frank Dresser |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Biz WDØHCO" wrote in message ... This is fun! Well yea about the regen for sure - Some of those Superhets leaked just as much. (Like a T.O. in a leatherette covered plywood box) The page I posted on the binaries says the Scott REE was used in the crew's quarters. Was the well shielded Scott radio provided so crewmen wouldn't be tempted to bring their own radio on board? but think about this... middle of the ocean - late at night - 100's of miles from anything - floating around in a sub with everything turned off - During a war under radio silence with just receivers turned on... 100 miles seems possible to me. I think "possible" and "iffy" are two ways of saying the same thing from different viewpoints. I suspect the usual thunderstorm crackle from South and Central America, the Caribbean, the Mediterranean and Africa would overwhelm local oscillator radiation from a superhet at much less than 100 miles nearly all the time. All bets are off in the case of a regenerative receiver being used with the detector's regeneration control turned up into the oscillation region in order that an anticipated CW signal could be heard more clearly. The posted page also says the Germans were suspected of being able to listen in on the 455 kc IF radiation. This would even more tenous than local oscillator radiation. Again, not impossible, but I doubt long range detection could be done with any reliability. I don't doubt ships were being detected at long range, and using well shielded receivers was a wise precaution. But I'll speculate that German code breaking detected at least as many ships as long range direction finding, and it wasn't immediately obvious to our Navy just what tipped off the ship's location. Frank Dresser |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Frank
Dresser" writes: All bets are off in the case of a regenerative receiver being used with the detector's regeneration control turned up into the oscillation region in order that an anticipated CW signal could be heard more clearly. ISTR reading once that regen sets (and the Navy was using plenty of them, especially for LW and VLF) really were a major problem. To copy CW, you do have to adjust so the set is just barely oscillating. Fortunately, most Navy regens had one or two RF stages ahead of the detector. I had an RAK VLF set that was just incredibly sensitive and selective, with 3-gang tuning and individual trimmer knobs on both RF stages. There was an HF edtion of this set too. The posted page also says the Germans were suspected of being able to listen in on the 455 kc IF radiation. This would even more tenous than local oscillator radiation. Again, not impossible, but I doubt long range detection could be done with any reliability. IF radiation would be pushing it, but it has the advantage that there's only a very narrow band of freqs to monitor. An advantage (for the U-boats) of regen rx is that one could listen to the enemy transmitter freqs, which you'd be monitoring anyway, and a steady "carier" would mean a nice plump target nearby. As for code cracking and good old "loose lips" in dockside bars, when enemy U-boats are sinking your ships, you don't *know* why, you just grope for possibilities, and radio receiver radiation was one explanation. Along those lines, our Navy did fool the U-boats into thinking that we were picking up on their super-regen radar detectors, thus causing them to shut those off, making it easier to catch them on the surface. --Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
C'mon - be honest. Just put it on Ebay and see what you get.
"Rich" wrote in message ... I found an EH Scott SLR-12-B (Navy? 'morale') receiver (550kc-16Mc) for sale. I would like to know what ($) to offer for it presuming good working condition. I have not been able to find much information about this set on the internet. If you know of any EH Scott BA resources I would appreciate if you share them with me. TIA! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Heath DX-60 Transmitter: GR-78 Receiver | Boatanchors | |||
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit | Boatanchors | |||
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit | Boatanchors | |||
fs rca cr91a communications receiver | Boatanchors |