Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Ah, I see. But at least I can still get relative readings from tube to tube, I suppose. (i.e. Get a scale reading for a known good tube, and compare others to it.) That is of some use to me--if the readings are somewhat linear. Yes I think the readings are generally proprtional to Gm, which is why the good-bad scale works. It's possible however that variations in the operating point could swamp the Gm variations: in other words, a tube that happened to draw more plate current for a given grid bias might test unusually strong even though its Gm was not higher. Any tester made after, say, 1950 will probably use a lower grid signal than 5V. The lower the better, for low-bias tubes like the 12AX7. 73, Alan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alan Douglas
adouglasatgis.net writes: Any tester made after, say, 1950 will probably use a lower grid signal than 5V. The lower the better, for low-bias tubes like the 12AX7. I'll bet my 1928 Hickok really "slams" that grid signal. It's so old that it has a 5-pin adapter with grid cap for them new-fangled screen-grid tubes, tetrodes or whatever they called 'em. It seems to use a wattmeter type of meter movement (dual coils) to multiply and correlate the grid drive nad plate output to compute the gm. Very cute unit. --Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Any tester made after, say, 1950 will probably use a lower grid signal than 5V. The lower the better, for low-bias tubes like the 12AX7. I'll bet my 1928 Hickok really "slams" that grid signal. It's so old that it has a 5-pin adapter with grid cap for them new-fangled screen-grid tubes, tetrodes or whatever they called 'em. It seems to use a wattmeter type of meter movement (dual coils) to multiply and correlate the grid drive and plate output to compute the gm. Very cute unit. --Mike K. Oddly enough, that model (AC-47) uses a 2.5VAC grid signal. And yes, it uses a dynamometer meter movement that measures AC milliamperes directly (6.25mA F.S.). It also has a DC plate milliammeter. 73, Alan |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Douglas adouglasatgis.net wrote:
Any tester made after, say, 1950 will probably use a lower grid signal than 5V. The lower the better, for low-bias tubes like the 12AX7. Two more questions: 1) Is there a risk of damaging a 12AX7 by testing it in the I-177? 2) Is there an easy way to lower the voltage of the grid signal in an I-177? Thanks. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Two more questions: 1) Is there a risk of damaging a 12AX7 by testing it in the I-177? I doubt it. 2) Is there an easy way to lower the voltage of the grid signal in an I-177? A resistive voltage divider at the 5V transformer winding would lower the signal to (say) 2.5V, which is just what Hickok did in some later models. *Theoretically* that would halve the Gm readings, but in practice, you'd have to measure some known-good tubes to get a new bogey value. 73 , Alan |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the modification of the transformer done on the adapter unit or the I-777?
I'm illterate as to the construction of this tester but I just picked one up and would like to have a way to accurately test 9 pins. thanks Jonathan Quote:
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|