Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
administration wanted to portray
the incident as an example of Soviet barbarity (shades of Basulto's Brothers to the Rescue). They, and specifically Jeanne Kirkpatrick, treated the downing as a great propaganda victory. In his book, The Target Is Destroyed, Hersh ended up siding with the administration. Which brings us to the nineties. Everyone knows that the broad release of Oliver Stone's JFK in 1992 put the Kennedy assassination back into play. The pre-release attack against the film was unprecedented in movie history. That's because it was more than just a movie. It was a message, with powerful political overtones that dug deeply into the public psyche: a grand political conspiracy had killed the last progressive president. That Vietnam would have never happened if Kennedy had lived. That JFK was working for accommodation with Castro at the time of his death. That the country has not really been the same since. The preemptive strike was successful in slowing up the film's momentum out of the starting block. But the movie did increase the number of people who believe the case was a conspiracy into th |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
the Rockefellers (Thy
Will be Done pp. 538-542). For those sins, and encouraging others to follow them, they must suffer the fate of the Undead. And Marilyn Monroe must be thrown into that half-world with them. At the hands of Bob Loomis' pal, that "liberal" crusader Sy Hersh. As Anson says, he must just want the money. Current events, most notably a past issue of Vanity Fair, and the upcoming release of Sy Hersh's new book, extend an issue that I have dealt with in a talk I have done several times around the country in the last two years. It is entitled "The Two Assassinations of John Kennedy." I call it that because there has been an ongoing campaign of character assassination ever since Kennedy was killed. In the talk to date, I've dealt primarily with the attacks on Kennedy from the left by Noam Chomsky and his henchman Alexander Cockburn which occurred at the time of the release of Oliver Stone's JFK. But historically speaking, the attacks on the Kennedys, both Jack and Robert, have not come predominantly from the left. The attacks from the right have been much more numerous. And the attacks from that direction were always harsher and more personal in tone. As we shall see, that personal tone knows no limits. Through papers like the New York Times and Washington Post, the attacks extend into the Kennedys' sex lives, a barrier that had not been crossed in post-war mainstream media to that time. To understand their longevity and vituperativeness, it is necessary to |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
the Rockefellers (Thy
Will be Done pp. 538-542). For those sins, and encouraging others to follow them, they must suffer the fate of the Undead. And Marilyn Monroe must be thrown into that half-world with them. At the hands of Bob Loomis' pal, that "liberal" crusader Sy Hersh. As Anson says, he must just want the money. Current events, most notably a past issue of Vanity Fair, and the upcoming release of Sy Hersh's new book, extend an issue that I have dealt with in a talk I have done several times around the country in the last two years. It is entitled "The Two Assassinations of John Kennedy." I call it that because there has been an ongoing campaign of character assassination ever since Kennedy was killed. In the talk to date, I've dealt primarily with the attacks on Kennedy from the left by Noam Chomsky and his henchman Alexander Cockburn which occurred at the time of the release of Oliver Stone's JFK. But historically speaking, the attacks on the Kennedys, both Jack and Robert, have not come predominantly from the left. The attacks from the right have been much more numerous. And the attacks from that direction were always harsher and more personal in tone. As we shall see, that personal tone knows no limits. Through papers like the New York Times and Washington Post, the attacks extend into the Kennedys' sex lives, a barrier that had not been crossed in post-war mainstream media to that time. To understand their longevity and vituperativeness, it is necessary to |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
been cut by a third without losing anything
of quality or substance. The book is heavily reliant on interviews which are presented in the main text. Some of them at such length-two and three pages-that they give the volume the air of an oral history. To make it worse, after someone has stopped talking, the authors tell us the superfluous fact that his wife walked into the room, making for more excess verbiage (p.60). And on top of this, the Blairs have no gift for syntax or language, let alone glimmering prose. As a result, even for an interested reader, the book is quite tedious. The Blairs spend much of their time delving into two areas of Kennedy's personal life: his health problems and his relationships with the opposite sex. Concerning the first, they chronicle many, if not all, of the myriad and unfortunate medical problems afflicting young Kennedy. They hone in on two in order to straighten out the official record. Previous to this book, the public did not know that Kennedy's back problem was congenital. The word had been that it came about due to a football injury. Second, the book certifies that Kennedy was a victim of Addison's disease, which attacks the adrenal glands and makes them faulty in hormone secretion. The condition can be critical in fights against certain infections and times of phys |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
been cut by a third without losing anything
of quality or substance. The book is heavily reliant on interviews which are presented in the main text. Some of them at such length-two and three pages-that they give the volume the air of an oral history. To make it worse, after someone has stopped talking, the authors tell us the superfluous fact that his wife walked into the room, making for more excess verbiage (p.60). And on top of this, the Blairs have no gift for syntax or language, let alone glimmering prose. As a result, even for an interested reader, the book is quite tedious. The Blairs spend much of their time delving into two areas of Kennedy's personal life: his health problems and his relationships with the opposite sex. Concerning the first, they chronicle many, if not all, of the myriad and unfortunate medical problems afflicting young Kennedy. They hone in on two in order to straighten out the official record. Previous to this book, the public did not know that Kennedy's back problem was congenital. The word had been that it came about due to a football injury. Second, the book certifies that Kennedy was a victim of Addison's disease, which attacks the adrenal glands and makes them faulty in hormone secretion. The condition can be critical in fights against certain infections and times of phys |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:22:44 GMT, [Jim Menning] said :-
"Jeff C" wrote in message news You have been trolled, and duped into polluting news.admin.net-abuse.email. And you have continued the chain. If you guys know the server being used, why haven't you got them to shut down this perp yet? Take care when you're posting to make certain that you post is going to where you think it is. I replied the same places you have. jim menning You are a moron Jim. Get a clue |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:22:44 GMT, [Jim Menning] said :-
"Jeff C" wrote in message news You have been trolled, and duped into polluting news.admin.net-abuse.email. And you have continued the chain. If you guys know the server being used, why haven't you got them to shut down this perp yet? Take care when you're posting to make certain that you post is going to where you think it is. I replied the same places you have. jim menning You are a moron Jim. Get a clue |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
part of the effort to
quadruple gasoline prices through their oil companies; David Rockefeller took part in the effort to get the American government to intervene in Chile in 1973; the Trilateral Commission, which the Rockefellers sponsored, funneled many of its members into the Carter administration; in 1979, Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller convinced Carter to let the Shah of Iran into the country for medical treatment. The reaction in Iran helped give us Reagan-Bush. The rest, as they say, is history. In comparing the two books, one is immediately struck by a difference in approach. Whatever the shortcomings of the Rockefeller book, there is a minimal reliance on questionable sources. And the concentration on individual lives very seldom extends into a pervasive search for sex and scandal. This difference extends to even the photos chosen for the two books. The Rockefeller book is fairly conventional with wide or half page group shots or portraits. In the Kennedy book, even the one page of group shots are tiny prints. The rest are wallet-sized head shots that when leafed through, give the impression of mug shots. The accompanying text is suitable to the photo layout. There |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
part of the effort to
quadruple gasoline prices through their oil companies; David Rockefeller took part in the effort to get the American government to intervene in Chile in 1973; the Trilateral Commission, which the Rockefellers sponsored, funneled many of its members into the Carter administration; in 1979, Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller convinced Carter to let the Shah of Iran into the country for medical treatment. The reaction in Iran helped give us Reagan-Bush. The rest, as they say, is history. In comparing the two books, one is immediately struck by a difference in approach. Whatever the shortcomings of the Rockefeller book, there is a minimal reliance on questionable sources. And the concentration on individual lives very seldom extends into a pervasive search for sex and scandal. This difference extends to even the photos chosen for the two books. The Rockefeller book is fairly conventional with wide or half page group shots or portraits. In the Kennedy book, even the one page of group shots are tiny prints. The rest are wallet-sized head shots that when leafed through, give the impression of mug shots. The accompanying text is suitable to the photo layout. There |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
I replied the same places you have. jim menning You are a moron Jim. Get a clue Back OT, I always liked the look of the Allen Bradly carbon comps, really lit up the underside of an audio amp. The only drawback, other than resistance shift, I remember hearing that they were quite noisy as plate resistors. Maybe so, but there is a heap of carbon comps out there! And that comment to Jim Menning was uncalled for. Jim will forget more accidently than you will _ever_ know. Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
non-inductive resistors: metal-film vs carbon ? | Antenna | |||
F.S. 100 ohm 2 watt resistors N.O.S. | Boatanchors | |||
Who sells high wattage non-inductive resistors? | Antenna | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors |