Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:42:48 -0500, " Uncle Peter" wrote: What you say is true, but still doesn't answer his question. The reason that "The manufacturers saw no need to use high tolerance components" had more to do with cost than careful engineering decisions. I would especially be wary of "NOS" carbon comp. They do NOT get better with age. If you want to use them to maintain the authentic look of an old radio, fine, just be aware that metal film is far superior. When I graduated from high school in 1959 I spent the next few years making a living by repairing those old tube radios and TVs, and a fair amount of the time was spent replacing carbon comps. They were state of the art at the time, but time has marched on. Caveat fixor. -- Bill W6WRT Well, I test every component before I install it, and so far most of the NOS carbon resistors have been well within tolerance. Carbon resistors made much before 1950 do have some issues with aging, and I find 50 to 75% well out of spec and they do get changed. I'd bet most of the resistors you were changing in 1959 are probably the same vintage that are found bad today. I won't argue metal films aren't better, but I haven't had problems with good quality carbons either. Pete |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
non-inductive resistors: metal-film vs carbon ? | Antenna | |||
F.S. 100 ohm 2 watt resistors N.O.S. | Boatanchors | |||
Who sells high wattage non-inductive resistors? | Antenna | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors |