Old Guy wrote:
"David" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:40:02 -0400, "Dave Edwards"
wrote:


See pics here....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE%3AIT&rd=1


Again, Amateur Bands only.

So post your diatribe to the group that gives a damn about your comments.
Rec.radio.amateur....
is just fine for this.



Uhhh where's the diatribe.

I only read an observation that it only had ham bands. A serious
limitation....

"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...
Old Guy wrote:
"David" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:40:02 -0400, "Dave Edwards"
wrote:


See pics here....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...rd=1&sspage n
ame=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1


Again, Amateur Bands only.

So post your diatribe to the group that gives a damn about your
comments.
Rec.radio.amateur....
is just fine for this.



Uhhh where's the diatribe.

I only read an observation that it only had ham bands. A serious
limitation....


I don't understand the purpose of the comment either??... Not a limitation
for hams interested in a vintage amateur receiver... My dad had one and his
comments were featured in QST. Now I know what it looks like.

73, Steve, K9DCI

Steve Nosko wrote:
"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...

Old Guy wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:40:02 -0400, "Dave Edwards"
wrote:


See pics here....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...rd=1&sspage n

ame=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1


Again, Amateur Bands only.

So post your diatribe to the group that gives a damn about your

comments.

Rec.radio.amateur....
is just fine for this.


Uhhh where's the diatribe.

I only read an observation that it only had ham bands. A serious
limitation....



I don't understand the purpose of the comment either??... Not a limitation
for hams interested in a vintage amateur receiver... My dad had one and his
comments were featured in QST. Now I know what it looks like.

73, Steve, K9DCI


Old Guy must be off his meds again.