Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill wrote: Mr Fed UP wrote: Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? You're confusing liability for damages with liability between partners of a corporation. Same word, different context. Here's a brief explanation taken from the web. Liability Issues of a Limited Liability Company In a limited liability company, a member's legal liability is limited to his or her investment in the business. Generally, a member's personal assets are not at risk, but a member's personal assets may be at risk if any of the following occurs: * A member personally guarantees a business debt. * The form of business is found to be a sham (not properly formed or maintained). * A member becomes personally liable as a result of his or her own acts or conduct. Technically, an "LLC" is a modified form of a partnership. In a traditional partnership, *each* owner is responsible for _all_ the liabilities of the business. In an LLC, 'n-1' (at *most*) of the partners are 'limited liability' partners -- they have liability exposure only up to the assets they have invested in the company (subject to 'special case' situations like those mentioned above, whereby they may incur additional liabilities). The remaining partner (or partners) is a "general partner", and is personally liable for any/all things above and beyond the assets provided by the "limited" partners. A full fledged "Corporation" is a 'legal person' in and of itself. Assets of the shareholders (the owners of the corporation) are immune from claims against the corporation. Officers and directors of the corporation may have personal liability to the shareholders for acts as a corporation official. Persons acting "on behalf of" the corporation may end up with personal liability for their own actions or conduct, IN ADDITION TO the corporation's liabilities for those actions/conduct. An LLC is much simpler -- in terms of organizational structure -- than a full- fledged corporation, But it gives the 'limited' members "almost all" of the protections of a passive stockholder in a corporation. Basically, it is an attempt to give the 'small guy' most of the benefits of the real corporation, without burdening him with all the overhead that is necessary for a large business entity -- WHILE, at the same time, ensuring that there _is_ a "responsible party" to fall back on, in the event of claims against the business. From a customer standpoint, there is essentially "no difference" between dealing with an LLC, and dealing with a full-blown corporation. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
FS/FT Commercial VHF/UHF & Test Gear - Long List | Swap |