LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 05, 05:54 PM
K7JEB
 
Posts: n/a
Default Old Xmtrs, "Ancient Modulation" and Modern Amps

The modern amp covers 160, though, along with the other bands, so of one is
lazy (hence his name), the linear is a reasonable approach.
Colin K7FM


This is what I suspected when I first asked my question, but many
posters here inferred it was not a reasonable approach.
Lazy Senior


I use low-level modulation and a linear amplifier to work AM. My
advice in selecting a linear amplifier for that mode is to focus on
the heat dissipation capability of the final devices, be they tubes
or transistors. Although the theoretical efficiency of a class-B
amplifier is something like 67%, that applies to a signal swinging
the amplifier between cutoff and saturation. For the carrier-wave
level, which will be 1/4 the peak output power, the operating point
will be in the regions of the characteristic curves that are much
less efficient. I typically get 25-30% from my SB-220 with a
250-watt carrier output power. Worst-casing a desired 375-watt
carrier level with 25% efficiency gives a final-power-dissipation
requirement of 1125 watts - a stretch for a pair of 3-500's, somewhat
easier with a 3CX1200 and easier still with an 8877/3CX1500.
The steady-state power-supply requirements are also pretty strenuous -
1500 watts - although most recent designs (Ameritron AL-1500) are
capable of this.

The efficiency argument against using a linear and in favor of
high-level modulation is seen to be fairly strong. However there
are a few additional factors to consider: As noted by another
poster, the modulator has to be powered up and has its own efficiency
issues. Also, using a linear amplifier rather than a Class-C final
reduces the harmonic-attenuation problem considerably (as well as
neighborhood TVI complaints). Modulation done at low levels is
more "controllable" with modestly sized components for splatter
filters, negative-peak loading/clipping and negative feedback. I
use an SSB transceiver (a Kenwood TS-850) for the extreme form
of this "modulation control", since my transmit signal is passed
through the same 6 kHz IF filter used for reception - effectively
filtering out splatter and out-of-channel IMD. The last advantage
of linear amplifier use, stated in the beginning of this thread, is,
of course, the ready availability of commercial units, both new and
used. For a dual-mode station (AM and SSB), the investment in
the amplifier pays a double dividend while, at the same time,
breathing new life into (and a whopping signal out of) many cherished
vintage low-power AM transmitters.

Jim, K7JEB



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Xmtrs, "Ancient Modulation" and Amps Lazy Senior Boatanchors 36 November 5th 05 01:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017